Whitley v. Ercole

CourtUnited States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
Citation725 F.Supp.2d 398
Docket NumberNo. 06 Civ. 10198(AKH).,06 Civ. 10198(AKH).
PartiesDarryl WHITLEY, Petitioner, v. Robert E. ERCOLE, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Decision Date22 July 2010

725 F.Supp.2d 398

Darryl WHITLEY, Petitioner,
Robert E. ERCOLE, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent.

No. 06 Civ. 10198(AKH).

United States District Court,S.D. New York.

July 22, 2010.

725 F.Supp.2d 399


725 F.Supp.2d 400


725 F.Supp.2d 401


725 F.Supp.2d 402


725 F.Supp.2d 403

Barry Robert Ostrager, Juan Alberto Arteaga, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Dana Renee Poole, New York, NY, for Respondent.


On November 2, 1981, Dr. John Chase Wood, a young doctor at Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan, was shot and killed as he walked to work. Thirteen years later, Darryl Whitley, the Petitioner, and Patrick McDowell were identified by jailhouse informants as the killers of Dr. Wood. Whitley and McDowell were tried separately in state court, but each jury was unable to come to a unanimous verdict. The two were retried, again in separate trials. At his second trial, McDowell, the alleged shooter, was found not guilty. Petitioner, the alleged accomplice, was convicted. On April 18, 2002, Whitley was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 22 years to life.

Whitley, having exhausted state procedures for relief from the judgment of conviction, timely filed this petition for habeas

725 F.Supp.2d 404

review. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006). He alleges violations of the Due Process and Confrontation Clauses of the United States Constitution. The issue I have to decide relates to the reading in Whitley's second trial of the testimony given by a key jailhouse informant in Whitley's first trial, without letting the second jury know that the informant claimed a lack of memory, sought to recant his prior testimony, and finally became unavailable after having invoked the Fifth Amendment.

a. The Crime

On the evening of November 2, 1981, Dr. John Chase Wood, 31, was on call at Columbia Presbyterian Hospital. Wearing his scrubs and white lab coat and carrying his stethoscope, Dr. Wood hurried home during his shift to comfort his pregnant wife. On his return to the hospital, while walking on Riverside Drive, two men accosted him, demanding prescription drugs. Dr. Wood said he had none. The men patted his pockets, took out Dr. Wood's prescription pad, and a scuffle broke out. One assailant drew a handgun and fired twice, fatally shooting Dr. Wood through his heart and left lung.

The assailants fled and Dr. Wood was taken to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, and died during surgery. Detective Gennaro Giorgio of the New York City Police Department was assigned to investigate the murder.

b. The Identification of McDowell and Whitley and Their Trials

Thirteen years later, in 1994, a jailhouse informant, Glenn Richardson, identified Patrick McDowell as the shooter, and Petitioner, Darryl Whitley, as the accomplice. Richardson's testimony was corroborated by other jailhouse informants. On March 24, 1995, the two were indicted and then tried separately. Each trial resulted in a hung jury.

The men were retried, again in separate trials. The State presented witnesses who testified that the defendants made inculpatory statements. Other witnesses testified that they heard the gunshots and saw the perpetrators from a distance. An eyewitness identified McDowell as the shooter. No witness to the event was able to identify Whitley. McDowell was acquitted. The jury in Whitley's trial returned a guilty verdict for second degree murder. On April 18, 2002, the Supreme Court sentenced Whitley to an indeterminate prison term of 22 years to life.

i. Testimony of Bernard Barnes

Bernard Barnes, a witness subpoenaed by the State, testified at Whitley's second trial that, during a visit to Whitley at Riker's Island in 1982, while Whitley was being detained in connection with an unrelated crime, Whitley stated that he was arrested for the robbery of a doctor and that, during the robbery, the doctor resisted, a gun was fired, and the doctor was killed. The People argued that Barnes's attribution of his arrest to the robbery, at a time when the police did not know the identity of either suspect, and his recounting of the events of the robbery and murder, showed that Whitley was one of Dr. Wood's assailants. On cross-examination, Barnes admitted that, when he told his story to Detective Gennaro Giorgio, he was facing a trial and heavy punishment for selling “crack” cocaine and that Detective Giorgio had offered substantial benefits by way of a reduced sentence if he cooperated and testified against Whitley and McDowell, and that he had been using drugs heavily when he told his story to Detective Giorgio.

ii. Testimony of Donald Caines

Donald Caines, another jailhouse informant, told Detective Giorgio in 1995 that

725 F.Supp.2d 405

ten years earlier, in 1985, while he and Whitley were housed at the Mt. McGregor Correctional Facility, Whitley admitted his involvement in Dr. Wood's murder. Caines, elaborating to Giorgio, said also that Whitley stated that McDowell shot himself in the foot during the robbery, and that they had been arrested because the ballistics from McDowell's gunshot wound matched the ballistics evidence from Dr. Wood's murder scene.

In truth, McDowell had previously suffered a gunshot wound to his foot, and the bullet recovered from McDowell's foot did not match the .22 caliber bullet used to kill Dr. Wood. Caines was impeached also by evidence that he previously had lied under oath, and by the substantial benefits that Caines had received from the People for his testimony, including cash payments in excess of $1,000.

iii. Testimony of Gregory Howard and Ricky Darlington

Gregory Howard, another jailhouse informant with an extensive criminal history, spoke to Detective Giorgio in 1995, while in jail for a parole violation. Howard told Giorgio that police had questioned him about Dr. Wood's murder shortly after its occurrence, in November 1981, and that soon after, Howard spoke to Whitley about being questioned “for this doctor thing.” Whitley allegedly responded, “[W]hat'd they pick you up for? It was me and [McDowell] down there, we did the doctor.” Howard gave this testimony in Whitley's trial, and testified that he and Whitley had had this conversation in the presence of Ricky Darlington, another long-term prisoner.

Howard testified that he was released from prison for his parole violation shortly after providing his statement to Detective Giorgio. He also testified that Giorgio and an assistant district attorney assisted him in obtaining a dismissal of an outstanding warrant. Darlington's testimony was to the same effect, as to both his direct testimony and the manner of his impeachment.

iv. Testimony of Detective Gennaro Giorgio

Detective Giorgio testified that he had been working on the Wood homicide since 1981, that he had interviewed Whitley in 1994 regarding the murder, and that he told Whitley that he and McDowell had been implicated in Dr. Wood's murder. Giorgio then told the jury of Whitley's response: “You don't have no case against [McDowell]. The only way you're going to get [McDowell] is through me.” The People argued that Whitley's response constituted an admission of his involvement in the murder

v. Eyewitness Testimony

Four eyewitnesses who saw the crime being committed testified at Whitley's trial. Three testified that they saw the assailants, but that it was too dark to make out their faces. A fourth eyewitness, Dorothy Howze, was closest to the incident, and ran to Dr. Wood's aid after the shooting. As the assailants fled, Howze heard one say “Why did you do that?,” to which the other responded, “I didn't mean to; it was an accident.” In 1994, Howze was presented with a photo array that contained pictures of Whitley and McDowell. Howze testified that she was “maybe, ninety-percent” sure that McDowell was the shooter, but could not identify Whitley as the accomplice. Tr. Jan. 24, 2002, at 129 (Doc. No. 17).

vi. Testimony of Glenn Richardson
1. Whitley's First Trial

At Whitley's first trial, Glenn Richardson testified that he, Whitley, and McDowell had grown up together and that he lent his .22 caliber revolver to McDowell in the fall of 1981. Richardson testified that

725 F.Supp.2d 406

Whitley told him, soon after Dr. Wood's murder, that he (Whitley) and McDowell were “on Riverside Drive, and they was looking for somebody to rob, and the doctor came along, and [Patrick] Raynard [McDowell] shot him.” In fuller part, Richardson testified:

[THE PEOPLE]: [In November of 1981], [w]ere you aware of an event of a doctor being killed?


[THE PEOPLE]: Okay, and just before that, did there come a time when Patrick Raynard McDowell asked you for something?

[RICHARDSON]: Yeah, he had asked me for a gun.

[THE PEOPLE]: And this was in the fall of 1981?

[RICHARDSON]: Yeah, I guess so. 1


[THE PEOPLE]: And when you, the gun that you gave to him, can you describe that?

[RICHARDSON]: It's a .22; it's a small revolver. 2


[THE PEOPLE]: Mr. Richardson, after you heard about the events did you approach Patrick McDowell again, or did you approach him?

[RICHARDSON]: Yeah, I seen him uptown.

[THE PEOPLE]: This is on 159th Street?


[THE PEOPLE]: Can you describe that for us?

[RICHARDSON]: I was walking uptown looking for him. I seen him on 159th Street. And I asked him about the gun he had borrowed from me, and he said that he had used it, so he couldn't return it to me.

[THE PEOPLE]: Did he use any particular phrase-

[RICHARDSON]: It was dirty.

[THE PEOPLE]:-about the gun?

[RICHARDSON]: Said the gun was dirty.

[THE PEOPLE]: The gun was dirty. What did that mean to you?

[RICHARDSON]: That he had used it.

[THE PEOPLE]: Now, what did you do as a result of that conversation? What did you do next?

[RICHARDSON]: I didn't believe him, I thought that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Whitley v. Ercole, Docket No. 10–3119–pr.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 7 Junio 2011
    ...the jury,” depriving Whitley of due process and “compromis[ing] the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.” Whitley v. Ercole, 725 F.Supp.2d 398, 418 (S.D.N.Y.2010). It rejected the State's contention that the Appellate Division's decision rested on an adequate and independent state l......
  • Whitley v. Ercole, 06 Civ. 10198(AKH).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • 9 Julio 2013
    ...this case were discussed extensively in my previous opinion and in the Second Circuit's decision in this case. See Whitley v. Ercole, 725 F.Supp.2d 398 (S.D.N.Y.2010)rev'd and remanded,642 F.3d 278 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 791, 181 L.Ed.2d 489 (2011). I summarize......
1 books & journal articles
  • Evidence
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • 5 Mayo 2022
    ...was to begin, the agent’s commanding officer stated that the agent would not be released even with a subpoena. Whitley v. Ercole , 725 F. Supp. 2d 398 (S.D.N.Y. 2010), rev’d on other grounds, Whitley v. Ercole , 642 F.3d 278 (2d Cir. 2011). A witness’s prior sworn testimony is admissible as......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT