Wichita Falls Protective Ass'n v. Lewis
Decision Date | 25 June 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 12690.,12690. |
Citation | 52 S.W.2d 134 |
Parties | WICHITA FALLS PROTECTIVE ASS'N v. LEWIS. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Wichita County; Allan D. Montgomery, Judge.
Action by C. C. Lewis against the Wichita Falls Protective Association. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
George & Brannan, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.
Bunnenberg & Nelson, of Wichita Falls, for appellee.
The defendant, Wichita Falls Protective Association, an unincorporated association, with its principal office and place of business in Wichita county, has appealed from a judgment for $700 rendered in favor of C. C. Lewis, plaintiff, on a life insurance policy issued by the defendant on the life of the plaintiff's wife, Mrs. Carrie Bess Lewis, in which the plaintiff was named as beneficiary.
The case was tried before the court without a jury, and since the record contains no findings of fact, with conclusions of law by the trial judge, every reasonable inference in favor of the judgment and having support in the record must be indulged.
The statement of facts shows that the policy sued on, which is designated as a certificate of insurance, was issued on the 2d day of May, 1931, upon an application in writing for membership in the defendant association made on the same date in the name of Carrie Bess Lewis. In the policy Mrs. Carrie Bess Lewis was designated as a "member" of the association, and paragraph 3 of the policy reads as follows: "That said member agrees to the stipulation herein that this certificate shall only bind the Wichita Falls Protective Association, of Wichita County, to pay to the order of C. C. Lewis, husband, the sum of one dollar received from each member in good standing at the time of his or her death, said amount not to exceed $1000 should he or she die in good standing in the Wichita Falls Protective Association."
Mrs. Carrie Bess Lewis died on May 10, 1931, eight days after the policy was issued. The written application for the policy was on a printed form, the blanks in which were filled out by the plaintiff C. C. Lewis himself, who also signed his wife's name thereto with her subsequent approval and ratification. At the time the application was made and the policy was issued, plaintiff paid to the defendant association the sum of $2, and by reason of that payment the policy was in force at the time of the death of the insured.
The written application for membership made in the name of Mrs. Carrie Bess Lewis and addressed to the defendant association embodies the following:
none "Physicians attended or consulted during last two years "Dr. ________ Address ________ I am not expecting surgical attention or anything to jeopardize my life except none I am in good health and good physical condition except ________. I understand that misrepresentation renders this application null and void "Applicant Carrie Bess Lewis. Send premium notices to C. C. Lewis. Town or City Wichita Phone 4391. Remarks ________ "Carrie Bess Lewis."
Among others, the policy embodies the following provisions:
"It is also agreed that if any untrue statement or statements have been made with fraudulent intent in the application as to age, health, family history or any other question that would materially increase the risk assumed, this certificate becomes void and of no effect."
The testimony shows without controversy that Mrs. Lewis died as the result of cancer of the lungs, and that she had had symptoms of cancer in her system for more than two years prior to her death. Plaintiff, who was a witness on the trial, in effect admitted such to be true.
It thus appears that the statement in the application that "I am in good health and good physical condition" was untrue; and one of the defenses made to the suit was that, since the same was false, and since the application was expressly made a part of the contract of insurance, the policy was voided under the further provision in the application...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mutual Health & Benefit Ass'n v. Cranford
... ... v. Miazza, 93 Miss. 18, 46 So. 817; Cooperative ... Assn. v. Leflore, 53 Miss. 1 ... There ... are two ... John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 247 ... N.W. 102; Wichita Falls Protective Assn. v. Lewis, ... 52 S.W.2d 134; ... ...
-
Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. v. Allen
...must not be involved with the agent, even informally, in perpetrating a fraud against the insurer, e. g., Wichita Falls Protective Ass'n v. Lewis, Tex.Civ.App.1932, 52 S.W.2d 134, no writ; Judd v. Lubbock Mutual Aid Ass'n, Tex.Civ.App.1925, 269 S.W. 284, no writ; The Homesteaders v. Stapp, ......
-
Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. Woodyard
... ... Yates, Tex.Com. App., 29 S.W.2d 980; Wichita Falls Protective Ass'n v. Lewis, Tex.Civ.App., 52 S. W.2d ... ...