Wichman v. Wichman
| Decision Date | 15 September 1998 |
| Citation | 719 A.2d 906,247 Conn. 910 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Barbara Z. WICHMAN v. Kenneth L. WICHMAN. |
Helen M. Kemp, East Hartford, in support of the petition.
Suzanne E. Caron, Vernon, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn.App. 529, 714 A.2d 1274 (1998), is denied.
I would grant the defendant's petition for certification to appeal.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Eckert v. Eckert
...A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000); Wichman v. Wichman, 49 Conn.App. 529, 535, 714 A.2d 1274, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 910, 719 A.2d 906 (1998). In deciding whether the trial court properly concluded that the separation agreement precluded modification of the definition of......
-
Welch v. Welch, No. FA92-0339295 (CT 3/10/2005)
...will be upheld." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Wichman v. Wichman, 49 Conn.App. 529, 535, 714 A.2d 1274, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 910, 719 A.2d 906 (1998). On the other hand, if a provision purportedly precluding modification is ambiguous, the order will be held to be modifiable. Brons......
-
O'Neill v. O'Neill
...loss of support." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Wichman v. Wichman , 49 Conn. App. 529, 532, 714 A.2d 1274, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 910, 719 A.2d 906 (1998)."It is a well settled principle of matrimonial law that courts have the authority under § 46b-86 to preclude the modification of......
-
Way v. Way
...to make periodic awards of alimony nonmodifiable'"; Wichman v. Wichman, 49 Conn. App. 529, 535, 714 A.2d 1274, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 910, 719 A.2d 906 (1998); lump sum alimony is a final judgment not modifiable by the court even if there is a change in circumstances; Smith v. Smith, 249 C......
Request a trial to view additional results