Wickham v. The Traders State Bank

Decision Date12 June 1915
Docket Number19,296
PartiesCELESTE WICKHAM, Appellee, v. THE TRADERS STATE BANK, Appellant
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided. January, 1915.

Appeal from Saline district court; DALLAS GROVER, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

SYLLABUS

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

EXEMPTIONS -- Exempt Automobile -- Mortgaged by Husband Alone -- Mortgage Void -- Decree of Divorce -- Divorced Wife Entitled to the Car. A husband doing business in the name of a corporation mortgaged an automobile, asserting it to be the property of such corporation, and later absconded. His wife procured a decree of divorce and was awarded all his personal property within the jurisdiction of the court. She claimed the car under the decree and proved that it was exempt as a necessary implement for her husband's use in his business. Held, that having established the exempt quality of the property which she as wife took by the decree, she is not estopped or bound by the husband's representations as to the ownership of the car.

David Ritchie, C. A. Spencer, and J. A. Fleming, all of Salina, for the appellant.

Thomas L. Bond, of Salina, for the appellee.

OPINION

WEST, J.

The Traders State Bank made a loan of $ 8000, taking as security certain bills of lading and a chattel mortgage on an automobile, which mortgage was signed, "The Wickham Grain Co. By H. W. Wickham, President." Some months afterwards H. W. Wickham absconded, and it was learned that a number of the bills of lading were forgeries, and the bank took possession of the automobile under the mortgage and sold it. Later Mrs. Wickham sued the bank for conversion of the car, claiming it as the divorced wife of Wickham under a decree giving her all of his personal property within the jurisdiction of the court, and recovered. There was testimony tending to show that Wickham had done a large amount of business in the name of The Wickham Grain Company, for which company a charter was at one time procured, but it never perfected its organization. It appears that the automobile was bought before the charter was procured and the mortgage in question was not executed until more than one year after the issuance of the charter. (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 1729.) There was testimony tending to show that business transactions in the name of The Wickham Grain Company were really with Wickham himself, and that the car in question was so used by him in his business as to bring it within subdivision 8 of section 3649 of the General Statutes of 1909 as exempt. If it were exempt, then the mortgage without the act or consent of the wife was void. (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 5235.)

The chief contention of the defendant is that in view of the hundreds of thousands of dollars of business transacted with the bank in the name of The Wickham Grain Company, the listing of the automobile for taxation...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Grandview State Bank v. Torrance
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1923
    ... ... 842, ... 66 P. 997; Alexander v. Logan, 65 Kan. 505, 70 P ... 339; Jackson v. Lambertson, 71 Kan. 138, 80 P. 55; ... Wickham v. Traders' State Bank, 95 Kan. 657, 149 ... P. 433; Babbitt v. Bent County Bank of Las Animas, ... 50 Colo. 258, 108 P. 1003; Boswell v. First ... ...
  • Pellish Bros. v. Cooper
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 11, 1934
    ... ... statute. In Bank v. Pulliam, 239 P. 595; Prater ... v. Riechman, (Tenn.) 187 S.W. 305, it ... statute of that state. Section 89-2992 should be considered ... in connection with our ... Gallagher, (Kans.) ... 254 P. 345. An earlier Kansas case, Wickham v. Bank, ... 149 P. 433, held that an automobile was exempt where used in ... construed in the [47 Wyo. 487] same way in Wickham v ... Traders' State Bank, 95 Kan. 657, 149 P. 433. That ... case relies, among others, ... ...
  • The Federal Agency Investment Company v. Baker
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • January 8, 1927
    ... ... EVIDENCE--Affidavits. Affidavits to be used as evidence must ... state facts, not conclusions ... 3 ... EXEMPTIONS--Automobile Truck ... [122 Kan. 461] Hovey, 56 Kan ... 637, 642, 44 P. 605; Bank v. McIntosh, 72 Kan. 603, ... 610, 84 P. 535; Belknap v. Sleeth, 77 Kan ... 333, 91 P ... 77); an automobile used by a grain dealer (Wickham v ... Bank, 95 Kan. 657, 149 P. 433); "a duplicating ... machine, a ... ...
  • Foster v. Foster
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • November 7, 1936
    ...(Lames v. Armstrong, 162 Iowa, 327, 144 N.W. 1, 49 L.R.A. (N.S.) 691, Ann.Cas.1916B, 511); and even in our own case of Wickham v. Bank, 95 Kan. 657, 149 P. 433, this more than ten years ago took notice of the fact that the automobile was rapidly and certainly superseding the 'wagon' which w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT