Wiedmayer v. Midland Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 05 October 1982 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 67766 |
Citation | 324 N.W.2d 752,414 Mich. 369 |
Parties | Eleanor J. WIEDMAYER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The MIDLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Lilly & Domeny, P. C. by Paul Z. Domeny, Kalamazoo, for plaintiff-appellee.
Little & Geary by James H. Geary, Kalamazoo, for defendant-appellant.
This case presents the question whether an insurer's failure to include a provision in an insurance policy which reserves the right to avoid liability in the event of a material misrepresentation by the insured precludes the insurer from doing so. The trial court answered this question in the negative, but the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court. We conclude that the trial court was correct.
H. Richard Wiedmayer was employed by Schoolmaster Plumbing & Heating. On October 31, 1975, Wiedmayer applied through his employer for group life and health insurance with the defendant, Midland Mutual. He signed the application directly beneath the declaration which stated in part that: "[t]he above representations are true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief and this application shall not be binding upon the company until the policy is issued by the company and the first premium has been paid while any conditions affecting insurability are as described herein". He checked the answer box "no" to the question "Have you or any of the above-named family members been hospitalized, consulted or been treated by a physician for any reason during the past five years?" Mr. Wiedmayer's application was accepted by the defendant, and the insurance policy went into effect on December 1, 1975. Accompanying the certificate of insurance was a letter from the defendant stating in part that:
Also attached to the letter forwarding the certificate was a captioned "Important Notice", with the following statement:
On January 13, 1976, Mr. Wiedmayer entered a hospital and was diagnosed as having chronic congestive heart failure. On July 16, 1976, the defendant refused to pay Wiedmayer's claim for health care treatment on the ground that Wiedmayer had falsely answered the question in the application with regard to whether he had consulted or had been treated by a physician during the past five years. Defendant enclosed a refund check and stated that the policy was void. Mrs. Wiedmayer subsequently required medical treatment, and Mr. Wiedmayer eventually died in April, 1977, of the heart problem. Mrs. Wiedmayer sued to recover the benefits for her husband's hospitalization, her medical treatment, and the life insurance proceeds under a provision of the policy. The suit was filed on March 13, 1978. After completion of discovery, the defendant moved for summary judgment, alleging that no genuine issue of material fact existed and attaching, among other things, the affidavit of the defendant's director of group claims to the effect that no policy would have been written at any price if the facts were known. Those facts included the allegation that, during the five years prior to his application, Mr. Wiedmayer, on at least nine occasions, had seen a physician who had diagnosed him as suffering from cardiac enlargement with evidence of pulmonary passive congestion and had prescribed medication, digitoxin. There was also evidence that Mr. Wiedmayer gave a history to his physician when entering the hospital in January, 1976, which included the fact that: . There was also deposition testimony from Mr. Wiedmayer's employer, Schoolmaster, to the effect that he had seen Mr. Wiedmayer take medication regularly in the month before the application for the insurance was filed and that Mr. Wiedmayer had also taken time off from work to see a doctor when he complained of not feeling well and being short of breath. Although the Wiedmayers did not cash the refund check for the premium, the defendant sent another refund check directly to Schoolmaster Plumbing, the owner of the policy, which was negotiated.
The plaintiff, Mrs. Wiedmayer, opposed the motion for summary judgment on a theory that the defendant had to show fraudulent intent to avoid the policy because of a material misrepresentation. The trial judge ruled that under statutory and case law the defendant did not have to show fraud to avoid a major medical or life insurance policy as long as there was a material misrepresentation. The trial judge found that there was no genuine dispute, that there was a material misrepresentation, and that the insurer would not have issued the policy had it been...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Globe Life Ins. Co.
...or hazard assumed by an insurer, MCL ž 500.2218; MSA 24.12218 permits the insurer to void the policy. Wiedmayer v. Midland Mut. Life Ins. Co., 414 Mich. 369, 374, 324 N.W.2d 752 (1982). The statute provides, in pertinent The falsity of any statement in the application for any disability ins......
-
Jones v. Jackson Nat. Life Ins. Co.
...which entitled Jackson National to cancellation of the policy as a matter of law. M.C.L. § 500.2218; Wiedmayer v. Midland Mutual Life Ins. Co., 414 Mich. 369, 375, 324 N.W.2d 752 (1982). Plaintiff asserts these defenses were waived by Jackson National when it failed to rely on them in its o......
-
Jacob v. Absolute Motor Cars, Inc.
... ... See Rogers v Great Northern ... Life Ins Co , 284 Mich. 660, 667; 279 N.W. 906 (1938); ... Wiedmayer v Midland Mut Life Ins Co , 414 Mich. 369, ... 375; ... ...
-
VHS of Mich., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...may be entitled to void coverage as a non-intentional or innocent misrepresentation of material fact. Wiemayer [Wiedmayer ] v. Midland Mutual Ins. , 414 Mich. 369 (1992) [(1982)].The parties engaged in written and oral discovery, and on January 22, 2020, before the expiration of the discove......