Wigfall v. City of Detroit
| Docket Number | 156793,157097 |
| Decision Date | 16 July 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
17 cases
-
Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC v. Papas (In re Greektown Holdings, LLC)
...Sch. Dist., 458 Mich. at 557–58, 581 N.W.2d at 716 (footnote omitted) (emphasis added); see also Wigfall v. City of Detroit , 504 Mich. 330, 340, 934 N.W.2d 760, 765–66 (2019). In concluding that the facts of the case supported a finding of agency, the Michigan Supreme Court emphasized that......
-
Esurance Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mich. Assigned Claims Plan
...(citations and emphasis omitted).14 Kendzierski v. Macomb Co. , 503 Mich. 296, 302, 931 N.W.2d 604 (2019).15 Wigfall v. Detroit , 504 Mich. 330, 337, 934 N.W.2d 760 (2019).16 O'Connell v. Dir. of Elections , 316 Mich. App. 91, 98, 891 N.W.2d 240 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted)......
-
Law Offices of Jeffrey Sherbow, PC v. Fieger & Fieger, PC
...employment of an agent in any other capacity or business.") (quotation marks and citation omitted).52 Id.53 See Wigfall v. Detroit , 504 Mich. 330, 340-342, 934 N.W.2d 760 (2019) (explaining that the agent can act in matters that the client has entrusted to the agent); see also Uniprop, Inc......
-
Drew v. Pac. Life Ins. Co.
...and implied—generally does not include things that are "specifically forbidden" by the principal. See, e.g. , Wigfall v. City of Detroit , 504 Mich. 330, 934 N.W.2d 760, 766 (2019). Nor does it generally include actions that are "contrary to the express intentions of the principal." See Wol......
Get Started for Free
