Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc., Civ. A. No. 92-0493 (RCL).
Decision Date | 13 May 1994 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 92-0493 (RCL). |
Citation | 853 F. Supp. 457 |
Parties | James R. WIGGINS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., and Kenneth Nedimyer, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia |
John C. LaPrade, Washington, DC, Frazier Walton, Jr., Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff.
Hadrian Katz, Erica Frohman Plave, Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, for defendants.
This matter comes before the court on defendant Philip Morris, Inc.'s motion to strike portions of plaintiff's complaint. Upon consideration of defendant's motion and plaintiff's opposition thereto, defendants' motion will be granted.
Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a court to "order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). Defendants contend that this court should strike paragraphs 24, 42, and 45 of plaintiff's complaint. In these paragraphs, plaintiff suggests that a Philip Morris employee — and former supervisor of plaintiff — was engaged in the use of controlled substances. These paragraphs portray a supervisor angered by his subordinate's knowledge of his drug use, leading to plaintiff's eventual termination from Philip Morris.
As plaintiff clarifies in his opposition to defendant's motion to strike, plaintiff argues that these allegations of "illicit drug usage by a Phillip Morris sic employee ... provide a grounds for that employee's racial animus and malice and intent in connection with Plaintiff's claims herein." Plf.'s Opp'n Def.'s Mot. to Strike at ¶ 7. Defendants object to the assertions made in these paragraphs as immaterial, impertinent, and scandalous.
Generally, motions to strike are disfavored by federal courts. However, if allegations in a complaint are irrelevant and prejudicial to the defendant, a motion to strike will be granted. See Todhunter, Mandava, & Assocs. v. I.C.C.I. (Holdings) Pty. Ltd., C.A. No. 88-3031, 1991 WL 166585 (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 1991) (Lamberth, J.).
Despite this high standard for prevailing on a motion to strike, this court finds that defendants have met this burden with respect to paragraphs 24, 42, and 45. See Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd., 647 F.2d 200, 201 (D.C.Cir.1981) ( )(citing 5 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1380, at 647-49 (1969)).
Plaintiff's allegations at issue fail to support plaintiff's legal claims against either defendant in this case.1 Indeed, these allegations cut against any liability of Philip Morris. Instead of providing a basis for a racially motivated termination, these allegations portray a renegade employee — not a party to this lawsuit — on a mission to tortiously interfere...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Campaign Legal Ctr. v. Iowa Values
...matter." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). But motions to strike are particularly "disfavored" by the federal courts. Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc. , 853 F. Supp. 457, 457 (D.D.C. 1994). Only if the allegations in a complaint are both irrelevant and prejudicial to defendant will a motion to strike be......
-
Aftergood v. Central Intelligence Agency, Civil Action No.: 01-2524 (RMU).
...Makuch v. FBI, 2000 WL 915767, at *2, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9487, at *7 (D.D.C. Jan. 6, 2000); e.g., Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc., 853 F.Supp. 457, 458 (D.D.C.1994); see also 5A FED. PRAC. & PROC. 2d §§ 1380, 1382. Thus, absent a "strong reason for so doing," courts will generally "not ta......
-
Nwachukwu v. Rooney
...of Investigation, 2000 WL 915767, at * 2, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9487, at *7 (D.D.C. Jan. 7, 2000); e.g., Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc., 853 F.Supp. 457, 458 (D.D.C.1994) (Lamberth, J.); see also 5A FED. PRAC. & PROC.2d §§ 1380, 1382. Thus, absent a "strong reason for so doing," courts will......
-
Dentons US LLP v. Republic of Guinea
...allegations are both "irrelevant and prejudicial to the defendant, a motion to strike will be granted." Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc. 853 F.Supp. 457, 457 (D.D.C.1994).III. ANALYSISA. Fraud in the Inducement To state a claim for fraudulent inducement, the complaint must allege that the def......