Wiggins v. State

Decision Date02 May 1968
Docket NumberNo. 280,280
PartiesAlphonso WIGGINS v. STATE of Maryland.
CourtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland

Michael Lee Kaplan, Baltimore, with whom was Morris Lee Kaplan, Baltimore, on brief, for appellant.

Henry J. Frankel, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom were Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., Charles E. Moylan Jr., State's Atty., for Baltimore City, and Stephen Montanarelli and John H. Lewin, Asst. State's Attys. for Baltimore City, Baltimore, on brief, for appellee.

Before MURPHY, C. J., and ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH and THOMPSON, JJ.

ORTH, Judge.

Rosina DiPaula, single, age 76 years, 5 feet tall, weight 128 pounds, died in Maryland General Hospital on 12 November 1966. The opinion of the Medical Examiner was that she died of broncho-pneumonia complicating extensive head injuries with brain damage and that the manner of death was homicide.

Alphonso Wiggins, age 15 years, was charged with her murder. He was found guilty of murder in the first degree at a court trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and sentenced to imprisonment for the balance of his natural life.

Rosina DiPaula lived with her elderly sister, Concertina, also single, at 1323 West North Avenue. Rosina was in good health on 4 October 1966, active, with her sister, in their embroidery work which they did in a sewing room on the second floor of their residence. Their brother, Joseph DiPaula, whose practice was to stop by to see them, both in the morning and in the afternoon, about five days a week, visited them at 6:00 P.M. that day. The were in the sewing room working. He ate a dish of broth they had prepared for him. Concertina asked him to cash Rosina's social security check in the amount of $68, but he had only $50 which he gave Concertina-'3 tens, 3 five dollars and five one dollor.' As he left the house about 6:30 P.M. he saw a young man, a Negro, standing outside the door on the steps. He was wearing a white jacket with 'University of Maryland' on it in blue lettering. He had a conversation with the boy. 'Thinking-hoping he would step down from the steps and go away. But, he did not make any effort.' The boy remained on the steps while DiPaula went to the corner and bought a newspaper in a drugstore. DiPaula watched him and 'after a littler while he stepped down, he walked toward the curb, he look up and down, then he came towards me.' The boy apparently made a telephone call from a booth on the corner and then walked away. DiPaula remained on the corner, allowing several buses to go by and then took a bus and went to his home. When he got home his wife had received a telephone call about his sisters and he went to the Maryland General Hospital. 'They were beyond recognition * * * Their head were swelled up and they were full of blood, and their hair was full of blood, their dress was full of blood, and they were just in a dying state * * * They were unconscious.'

On 4 October 1966 about 6:40 P.M. Sergeant James Osborne and Officer Richard Battania of the Baltimore City Police went to 1323 West North Avenue in response to a call that a burglary was being committed at that address. The vestibule door to the house was closed but not locked. The main door had been broken, one of the hinges had been torn loose and the door was hanging from the other hinge. They entered and found Concertina DiPaula and Rosina DiPaula in the hallway, each lying in a pool of blood. Osborne testified, 'There was a lot of blood, I estimate maybe three-quarters of a pint or pint around each one of them, and difficult to tell where they were injured, so much blood all mixed up in their hair and all.' Rosina was by the telephone with the receiver in her hand but the phone had been jerked from the wall and 'was no longer in operation.' The police heard 'a noise out back as if someone was leaving the house' and Battania ran toward the kitchen. Osborne went to the second floor. There was blood from where the sisters were found on the first floor all the way to the sewing room on the second floor. The entire house had been ransacked,-doors and drawers pulled open, a mattress on a bed on the third floor rolled up and removed from the bed, pillows thrown on the floor, papers strewn about, clothes taken from closets and discarded on the floor, chairs knocked over. Officer Davis had also received a call about the burglary. He went to the rear of the 1300 block West North Avenue. As he drove up the narrow alley he saw a boy running out of a rear yard of a house in that block. The boy was carrying what appeared to be a shoe box and a couple of books under his arm. In his other hand was what appeared to be a gun. As the police car proceeded up the alley the boy fired three shots at it. The boy ran up an intersecting alley. The police commanded him to halt and fired two shots at him but he continued running to Etting Street when he was joined by another youth. They both ran up an alley in the rear of the 2300 block Etting Street and the police lost sight of them. Rosina and Concertina DiPaula were taken to Maryland General Hospital in an ambulance.

Antonio Vega, age 13 years, was with the appellant, Willie June and Lee Cephus about 6:00 P.M. on 4 October 1966. Vega was wearing a white University of Maryland jacket. They went 'up on North Avenue' to the super market and June suggested they snatch a pocketbook but Vega said he did not want to do that. June then said, 'Well we wait until they go in the house then we get their money.' 1 Vega declined to do this and the others asked him to watch for them. He stayed outside the house to 'watch out for them * * * If anybody come to tell them somebody coming.' The other three went into the house. After a while he heard somebody scream. The scream come 'out of the house they went * * * It sound more like a women.' Vega was scared. He saw the police coming and hollered police and ran. He went to a cellar on Brunt Street and the appellant, Cephus and Elders were there. 2 Cephus had a cigar box containing 'earrings and stuff' and he had some money in his hand. The appellant had a gun and some empty cartridge cases. The appellant had blood on his hand and wiped it on Vega's jacket. Vega left, leaving the jacket.

Rudolph Mattews, age 14 years, saw the appellant, June and Cephus on 4 October at a sandwich shop at Pennsylvania and Lafayette Avenues. June said they were going to make some money and the three of them went 'down North Avenue.' He saw the appellant the next day playing dice with some other boys. The appellant told him 'he made a hustle.' The appellant had money-'fives, ones, tens,' and some jewelry which he said he got and was going to pawn. He had seen the appellant with a gun two or three weeks before.

Allen A. Jones, age 14 years, saw the appellant the early part of October in a group playing 'skelly.' The appellant 'was talking. He said him and Lee (Cephus) was on North Avenue and they went in the lady's house and took and beat the ladies with brass knuckles and iron pipes, and they was saying they were searching for money.' The appellant's jacket 'had something red on it.'

Eugene Golden, age 13 years, also saw the appellant the early part of October. 'He (the appellant) say he made a hustle up on, he said he was up there, North Avenue, a super market and say when he seen these two old ladies come out, he walked around the back. At first him and Lee was talking to them, then he say he walked around the back. He said he seen the lady going in the market, then he say he walked around the back and tried to get in the door, os he couldn't get in the door. When he came back around he seen the two old, seen the two ladies, then the lady walked in the house, so he said I planned this. He say I going to play this thick. * * * He said, he say I play this thick. He say when they came to the door I knocked on the door and said who is it. He said, Collectors. And when the lady got the door half way open, that is when he say he forced his way in. * * * He said when he broke the chain, he said there was a lady upstairs, he say he hit, somebody hit the lady and say when the lady upstairs heard them scream, then when the other lady upstairs and somebody somebody chased them back upstairs. I have forgotten who he say chased her back upstairs. * * * He say, after he told me that, then, that is when he had all that money.' Golden saw money in the appellant's possession; 'he had a couple of tens and fives and ones.' He also saw that the appellant had brass knuckles, a gun and a night stick. The appellant told him that he went out the back of the house 'and somebody said halt, and somebody shot at him, and he jumped over the back wall.' While he was in the presence of the appellant, Cephus came up and Cephus and the appellant 'got to fussing' and the appellant gave Cephus some money.

Jerome Wells, age 13 years, was one of the group shooting 'Skelly'. He heard the appellant say that 'he had beat these two old ladies with iron pipe and brass knuckles.'

Evidence sufficient to prove the corpus delicti was admitted by stipulation.

As part of its case, the State, in addition to the evidence as above summarized, offered a statement made by the accused on 9 November 1966 at Boys' Village. 3 On the issue of the voluntariness of the statement, the State produced Detective Howard Corbin of the Homicide Squad of the Baltimore City Police Department. Corbin said that he interrogated the appellant in a large office or assembly room at the Village in the presence of Detective William Craig, Detective Edward Chlan and John Swenson, a social worker employed at the Village. Prior to questioning, the appellant was 'advised that he could remain absolutely silent, that he had a right to an attorney to advise him, or be present with him during the taking of any statement whatsoever. If he wished to stop on making these statements he could to so at any time he so desired * * * He was also advised that any statement that he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Leuschner v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 14, 1980
    ...487 (1950); Fried v. State, 42 Md.App. 643, 402 A.2d 101 (1979); Brown v. State, 6 Md.App. 564, 252 A.2d 272 (1969); Wiggins v. State, 4 Md.App. 95, 241 A.2d 424 (1968), cert. denied, 251 Md. 753 (1968); Keller v. State, 2 Md.App. 623, 236 A.2d 313 (1967). Fried, supra, makes it clear, howe......
  • Bane v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • November 13, 1987
    ...as a dwelling is not controlling, for burglary prosecution purposes, when its later use is no longer a dwelling); Wiggins v. State, 4 Md.App. 95, 109-10 n. 9, 241 A.2d 424, cert. denied, 251 Md. 753 (1968) (crime of breaking and entering a dwelling house was not burglary when police report ......
  • Kidd v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • November 3, 1976
    ...v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 7, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1493, 12 L.Ed.2d 653; Lyter v. State, 2 Md.App. 654, 236 A.2d 432.' See also Wiggins v. State, 4 Md.App. 95, 105-106, 241 A.2d 424; Barnhart v. State, supra, at 5 Md.App. 224-225, 246 A.2d 280; Bates v. State, supra, at 32 Md.App. 113-114, 359 A.2d Fe......
  • Boswell v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • December 30, 1968
    ...the crime occurred and was sufficient for the jury to find that the breaking and entering were in the nighttime. See Wiggins v. State, 4 Md.App. 95, note 9, 241 A.2d 424. We think, in any event, that the challenged evidence was harmless as The matter of the competency of trial counsel was n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT