Wilbur v. Campbell
Decision Date | 08 December 1966 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 214 |
Citation | 280 Ala. 268,192 So.2d 721 |
Parties | Belle Campbell WILBUR v. Lionel CAMPBELL et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Robert Sellers Smith, Huntsville, Goodwyn & Smith, Montgomery, for appellant.
Cloud, Berry & Ables, Huntsville, for appellees.
The appellant, Belle Campbell Wilbur, filed a bill for a declaratory judgment seeking a construction of her husband's will as vesting in her a fee simple title to the farm land devised to her by Item Two of the will. The respondents demurred to the bill, challenging its equity on the ground that the will, attached to and made a part of the bill, shows that complainant's title to the property 'constitutes a fee simple estate subject to a condition subsequent.' The demurrer was sustained, with the decree also providing as follows: '(T)he Court being of the opinion said bill cannot be amended to give it equity it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that said bill be and the same is dismissed and the Complainant is taxed with the costs herein, for which let execution issue.' This appeal is from that decree.
As a predicate for sustaining the demurrer, the trial court expressed its opinion 'that the will is unambiguous and that * * * the devise in Item Two * * * is unambiguous and that such a devise by a husband in total restraint of a second marriage by his wife is valid and will be enforced according to its terms and that complainant is vested with a fee simple title in the real estate devised to her subject to a condition subsequent, abridging or defeating such title, in the event of her remarriage.'
No point is made as to the propriety of construing the will in ruling on the demurrer. The parties argue the case on the basis of the demurrer and appear desirous that this court determine whether the trial court correctly construed the will. The applicable principle is thus stated in Town of Citronelle v. Gulf Oil Corp., 270 Ala. 378, 380, 119 So.2d 180, 181:
The provisions of the will pertinent to a determination of the testator's intent are contained in Items Two through Five, viz.:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
1942 Gerald H. Lewis Trust, Matter of
...even after his death." Restatement of Property § 426(1) comment c. Recent cases merely reiterate the rule. See, e.g., Wilbur v. Campbell, 280 Ala. 268, 192 So.2d 721 (1966). This is a case of first impression in Colorado, and, although we reach the same result, we are not persuaded by the r......
- Sharp v. Elliotsville Cumberland Presbyterian Church