Wilcox v. City of Utica

Decision Date04 October 1974
Citation364 N.Y.S.2d 665,80 Misc.2d 998
PartiesRobert WILCOX, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF UTICA, Defendant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court
Giruzzi & Zamorski, Frank J. Giruzzi, Utica, of counsel, for plaintiff
MEMORANDUM DECISION

EDWARD F. McLAUGHLIN, Justice:

Plaintiff moves by Order to Show Cause, returnable before Special Term, September 5, 1974, for an Order declaring Section 16--13 of the Utica City Charter null and void and unenforceable and restraining enforcement of such Section of the Charter until further Order of this Court.

A Summons and Complaint was served by plaintiff in an action for declaratory judgment and issue was joined by service of an Answer by defendant. After due notice to both parties, they agreed that this motion be considered as one for summary judgment under CPLR 3212 on the pleadings and records submitted, including exhibits.

The facts disclose that the defendant, City of Utica, through its Corporation Counsel's Office served a Notice in writing on J. M. Fields Department Store advising that a sale of goods and merchandise on Labor Day is prohibited by the aforesaid Section 16--13 of the Utica City Charter and that the store could not be open on that day, and if it were, official action would be taken to close it, under the provisions of this Section of the City Charter.

J. M. Fields Department Store is located in a large shopping center known as the Riverside Mall in the City of Utica, New York. The plaintiff is the manager of the Riverside Mall and has a financial and pecuniary interest in J. M. Fields Department Stores and other stores who are tenants in the Mall, since he receives compensation based on total sales made by such retail stores and, therefore, has status to bring this action.

It is claimed that curtailment of the sales would result in the closing of these stores by virtue of this provision of the City Charter, and thereby damage the plaintiff and that this would be a continuing condition requiring the determination of the validity of the Section of the City Charter 16--13 and if found to be invalid, curtailment of its future use is sought in this motion for Summary Judgment.

The Section of the Charter in question, 16--13, copy of which is part of the pleadings as an exhibit, is entitled 'Holiday sales; restricted, regulated'. It reads as follows:

'All manner of public selling or offering for sale of any property upon Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day and Thanksgiving Day is prohibited, except as follows * * *'.

The exceptions relate to the sale of food articles, meals, catering, miscellaneous articles such as tobacco, bread, milk, eggs, newspapers, magazines, etc., groceries, delicatessens, bakeries, with hours limited between 4:00 P.M. and 7:30 P.M., alcoholic beverage sales to be conducted in accordance with the existing State laws, and further provides that the provisions of Section 2142 and Section 2149 of the Penal Law of New York State shall apply in their entirety to any party violating this Local Law (section).

This Section of the Utica City Charter, 16--13, depends for its legal existence on Section 86 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York entitled 'Regulation of Commercial and Business Activities on Memorial Day and Independence Day.' This statute provides 'the municipal officers and boards of the several cities, towns and villages of this State, now having the authority to enact ordinances and local laws, may adopt ordinances or local laws regulating the nature of commercial and business activities that may be conducted on Memorial Day and Independence Day and the hours within which the various types of commercial and business activities may be conducted on Memorial Day and Independence Day. Provisions shall be made in such ordinances or local laws for punishment of violations thereof'.

From a reading of the Charter Section 16--13 and Section 86 of the General...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Caldor, Inc. v. Ulster County, 888
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1981
    ...55 Misc.2d 802, 286 N.Y.S.2d 766; People of the State of New York v. Kaufman, 59 Misc.2d 113, 298 N.Y.S.2d 241; Wilcox v. City of Utica, 80 Misc.2d 998, 364 N.Y.S.2d 665.) This court would not pare and sever the objectionable portions of the Local Law since it would be removing what appears......
  • Ludlow's Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. LaBella
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 7, 1974
    ... ... Supreme Court, Oneida County ... Oct. 7, 1974 ...         Walter G. Pratt, Utica, for petitioner ...         Davies Johnson, Utica, for respondents ... MEMORANDUM ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT