Wilcox v. Emmons
Decision Date | 29 July 1946 |
Docket Number | No. 5189-PH.,5189-PH. |
Citation | 67 F. Supp. 339 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of California |
Parties | WILCOX v. EMMONS et al. |
A. L. Wirin, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.
Charles H. Carr, U. S. Atty., and Mildred Kluckholm, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal, for defendants.
This case involves the powers of the Commanding General of the Western Defense Command under Executive Order Feb. 19, 1942, No. 9066, C.F.R. Tit. 3, p. 1092 Cum.Supp; 7 R.F. 1407, and Law 503, 56 Stat. 173, 18 U.S.C.A. § 97a.
On September 6, 1943, the plaintiff was seized in his home in California and ejected by the use of physical and military force from the State of California by a squad of soldiers acting under the orders of the defendant Commanding General of the Western Defense Command, and was thereafter excluded from the State of California for several months, for which he seeks damages in this action.
The ejectment and exclusion were done under an Order directed to the plaintiff, individually, excluding him from Military Areas Numbers 1 and 2 which included among other areas the entire State of California. The defendant, General De Witt, is the only defendant who has appeared. Service has been had upon none of the other defendants, nor have they voluntarily appeared as did General DeWitt.
The defendant, General De Witt, filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Thereafter the plaintiff filed a similar motion.
Both motions were noticed and heard together. All matters have been extensively argued and briefed. While subdivision (c) of Rule 56 permits judgment, if "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact" (except as to the amount of damages); and while subdivision (d) requires an order "specifying the facts that appear without substantial controversy, including the extent to which the amount of damages or other relief is not in controversy," it is nevertheless necessary to ascertain what the material facts are, and what material facts exist without "substantial controversy" or "genuine issue" before either a final or partial judgment can be rendered.
This is especially true where, as here, the matters involved cover not only the record of the previous case, but also involve so many facts which must be judicially noticed.
After the arguments and after briefs were filed, the parties were requested to file statements of their contentions as to what material facts existed without substantial controversy or genuine issue.
From these statements and the evidence, records and files in the case, I now find the following facts to be material and to exist without substantial controversy or genuine issue:
1. On December 8, 1941, Congress declared war upon Japan, 55 Stat. p. 795, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, note preceding section 1. Said Statute is now and ever since said date has been in full force and effect.
2. On December 11, 1941, the Western Defense Command was created within the War Department which included the whole of the States of Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, Montana, Idaho, Utah, and Nevada, and on the same date the defendant herein, Lt. General John L. De Witt, was designated as Commanding General of the Western Defense Command.
3. On December 11, 1941, the Western Defense Command was designated by military authorities as a theater of military operations. Such a theater is defined as an area necessary for military operations and the administration and supply incident to military operation. The zone closest to the enemy which is required for the actual operation of the combatant forces is designated as a combat zone. The rear area of a theater of operations is known as a zone of communication, in which supply and administrative troops function to provide necessary service for the combat forces. The coastal area of the coastal states of Washington, Oregon, and California was a combat zone, and the remaining area of the Western Defense Command was a zone of communication.
4. On December 12, 1941, Executive Order 8972, 3 CFR Cum.Supp. p. 1038, was promulgated and was in full force and effect at all times herein mentioned. It authorized the Army and Navy to establish and maintain military guards and patrols, or by other appropriate means to protect "national-defense material" "national-defense premises" and "national-defense utilities."
5. On February 14, 1942, the defendant as Commanding General of the Western Defense Command made a report and recommendation to the Secretary of War concerning the "Evacuation of Japanese and Other Subversive Persons From The Pacific Coast" (Final Report Japanese Evacuation From The West Coast, by General De Witt, U. S. Government Printing Office), in which he recommended, among other things, (p. 36) that an Executive Order be procured for, "authority to designate military areas in the combat zone in the Western Theater of operations (if necessary to include the entire combat zone), from which, in his discretion, he may exclude all Japanese, all alien enemies, and all other persons suspected for any reason by the administering military authorities of being actual or potential sabotuers sic espionage agents, or fifth columnists," and that such legislation be "implemented by the necessary legislation imposing penalties for violation."
6. February 19, 1942, the President promulgated Executive Order No. 9066 as follows:
7. On February 20, 1942, the Secretary of War sent a letter to the defendant and enclosed a copy of said Executive Order and designated the defendant "as the military commander to carry out the duties and responsibilities imposed in the Western Defence Command, including such changes in the prohibited and restricted areas heretofore designated by the Attorney General as you deem proper to prescribe" and giving him other instructions. (For text of letter see De Witt's Report, pages 25, 26.) On the same day, to wit, February 20, 1940, the Assistant Secretary of War forwarded a memo to the defendant as Commanding General which contained an outline of the suggested method of procedure which might be followed in carrying out an evacuation program. (For full text, see De Witt's Report, pages 27, 28, 29.)
8. Immediately upon the promulgation of Executive Order No. 9066, the War Department, with the approval of the President, requested the Congress to enact legislation to provide sanctions for the enforcement of directives issued under the authority of the Executive Order. A...
To continue reading
Request your trial