Wilcox v. Matteson
Decision Date | 27 September 1881 |
Citation | 9 N.W. 814,53 Wis. 23 |
Parties | WILCOX v. MATTESON. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Jefferson county.R. B. Kirkland and I. N. & G. W. Bird, for respondent.
Harlow Pease, for appellant.
This action was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note given by the appellant to the deceased husband of the respondent, payable to his order, and indorsed by him in blank. The answer denies the ownership of the note by the respondent. The question of ownership was the only question litigated on the trial. The plaintiff claimed upon the trial that the note in question had been given to her by her husband in his life-time. The only evidence tending to prove such ownership was the following:
Harriet Edgar, a witness for the plaintiff, testified that she attended the deceased husband in his last sickness, and that on the night of his death, and about three hours before his decease, the deceased
Dyer Williams, a witness for the plaintiff, testified that he saw Wilcox about six hours after he died.
The respondent herself testified that the note in suit was in the pocket-book when it was delivered to her, and that it was indorsed by the deceased in his own handwriting. She also testified that she had been duly married to the deceased, and that the deceased died without leaving any children or other lineal descendants.
Upon this evidence the learned circuit judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff. To this ruling the defendant duly excepted, and appeals to this court from the judgment rendered upon such verdict.
Upon this appeal the defendant alleges as error that the evidence produced on the trial shows affirmatively that the note upon which the action was brought was not owned by the plaintiff, but belonged to the estate of her deceased husband, and that the evidence offered for the purpose of showing a gift of the same by the deceased to the plaintiff during his life-time failed to show such gift. We are constrained to agree with the learned counsel for the appellant that there is no evidence in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pirie v. Le Saulnier
...v. Collins, 74 Wis. 341, 43 N. W. 160, 5 L. R. A. 531;Kellogg v. Adams, 51 Wis. 138, 8 N. W. 115, 37 Am. Rep. 815;Wilcox v. Matteson, 53 Wis. 23, 9 N. W. 814, 40 Am. Rep. 754;Second National Bank of Beloit v. Merrill, 81 Wis. 142, 50 N. W. 503, 29 Am. St. Rep. 870;Dickson v. Bills, 144 Wis.......
-
Dickson v. Bills
...intention is inferable from the evidence relating to the attempted gift of the furniture, which was entirely oral. Wilcox v. Matteson, 53 Wis. 23, 9 N. W. 814, 40 Am. Rep. 754;Schultz v. Becker, 131 Wis. 235, 110 N. W. 214. In all such cases of constructive delivery, a finding of the trial ......
-
Hillman v. Young
... ... of the notes or the fund arising therefrom would not validate ... the gift causa mortis. Wilcox v. Matteson, 53 Wis ... 23, 9 N.W. 814, 40 Am.Rep. 754; Walter v. Ford, 74 ... Mo. 195, 41 Am.Rep. 312. Thus where a woman in ... ...
-
Stokes v. Sprague
... ... Iowa 95] The delivery may be to a third person for the donee ... 8 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 1349. In Wilcox v. Matteson, ... 53 Wis. 23 (9 N.W. 814), it appeared that the husband of the ... plaintiff, while on his deathbed, and three hours before his ... ...