Wilder v. Ayres

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtThe Appellate Division, Breitel
CitationWilder v. Ayres, 163 N.Y.S.2d 966, 3 N.Y.2d 725 (N.Y. 1957)
Decision Date09 May 1957
Parties, 143 N.E.2d 514 Alec WILDER, Appellant, v. Shirley Osborne AYRES, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Lemuel Ayres, Deceased, and Shirley Ayres, individually and as co-partners doing business as Balmor Kennels, Respondents.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 2 A.D.2d 354, 156 N.Y.S.2d 85.

Action was brought for injuries sustained by plaintiff when injured on premises of defendant, to which plaintiff had been invited as a social guest, on ground that status of plaintiff had changed at time of accident from that of a social guest to a business invitee because of a request by defendants, who raised dogs as an avocation, to retrieve a straying dog.

The Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York Courty, Harold A. Stevents, J., entered judgment for plaintiff for $6,201.65, and the defendants appealed.

The Appellate Division, Breitel, J., reversed the judgment, set aside the verdict, dismissed the complaint, and held that status of plaintiff was not changed from that of a social guest to a business invitee.

The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals, contending that one who acts in furtherance of the material interest or business of owner of realty...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Speece v. Browne
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 2, 1964
    ... ... Shea, 326 Mass. 681, 96 N.E.2d 163; Pearlstein v. Leeds, 52 N.J.Super. 450, 145 A.2d 650; Wilder v. Ayers, 2 A.D.2d 354, 156 N.Y.S.2d 85, affirmed 3 N.Y.2d 725, 163 N.Y.S.2d 966, 143 N.E. 514; Murrell v. Handley, 245 N.C. 559, 96 S.E.2d 717; ... ...
  • Cesario v. Chiapparine
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 25, 1964
    ...'a verbal paradox' may thereby seem to be engendered (Wilder v. Ayers, 2 A.D.2d 354, 356, 156 N.Y.S.2d 85, 88, affd. 3 N.Y.2d 725, 163 N.Y.S.2d 966, 143 N.E.2d 514; Kirkup v. Kirkup, 279 App.Div. 803, 109 N.Y.S.2d 364; Sheingold v. Behrens, 275 App.Div. 671, 686, 86 N.Y.S.2d 188). To date, ......
  • Pandiscio v. Bowen
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • April 7, 1961
    ...376; Mitchell v. Legarsky, 95 N.H. 214, 215-216, 60 A.2d 136; Wilder v. Ayers, 2 A.D.2d 354, 356-357, 156 N.Y.S.2d 85, affirmed 3 N.Y.2d 725, 163 N.Y.S.2d 966; Murrell v. Handley, 245 N.C. 559, 561-562, 96 S.E.2d 717; McHenry v. Howells, 201 Or. 697, 704, 272 P.2d 210; Porter v. Ferguson, 5......
  • Quinlan v. Cecchini
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 10, 1977
    ...of the vestibule constituted a "trap or hidden danger" (Wilder v. Ayers, 2 A.D.2d 354, 156 N.Y.S.2d 85, affd., 3 N.Y.2d 725, 163 N.Y.S.2d 966, 143 N.E.2d 514). The "single standard of reasonable care" rule no longer so confines us. Our primary concern has now been shifted from the status of......
  • Get Started for Free