Wiley v. Murphree
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | THOMAS, Justice. |
| Citation | Wiley v. Murphree, 228 Ala. 64, 151 So. 869 (Ala. 1933) |
| Decision Date | 21 December 1933 |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 741. |
| Parties | WILEY v. MURPHREE. |
Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1934.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; W. L. Parks, Judge.
Bill by Robert Murphree, as executor of the estate of Gussie M Wiley, deceased, against Olive Wiley and others, for construction of a will. From the decree, the named respondent appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
To determine testator's intention in case of latent ambiguity in will, court will look to words of will itself.
The will involved is as follows:
Lois and James, the children of Lois and the children of James receiving their mother's and father's share respectively in equal parts.
The securities issued by the county of Madison, and here involved, are in the following form:
Indorsement:
The instrument also carries coupon No. 8, which is...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Reid v. Armistead
... ... Johnson, 200 Ala. 178, 75 So. 926. If that ... intent cannot be ascertained, by reason of the existence of ... ambiguity within the rule (Wiley et al. v. Murphree, ... Ex'r, etc. [Ala. Sup.] 151 So. 869), the court ... should endeavor to put itself in the testator's place to ... a right ... ...
-
Smith v. Smith
...is indicated by the context and circumstances of the case....’ ” Harrison v. Morrow, 977 So.2d at 459–60 (quoting Wiley v. Murphree, 228 Ala. 64, 68, 151 So. 869, 872 (1933)). Merriam–Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines tack as “stable gear” and “articles of harness ( as saddle and brid......
-
Gafford v. Kirby
...v. Andrews, 355 So.2d 341 (Ala.1978). We have repeatedly referred to this intent as the polestar that guides us. Wiley v. Murphree, 228 Ala. 64, 151 So. 869 (1933). In order to arrive at that intention, we must look to the instrument(s) as a whole rather than construing any one paragraph se......
-
Rudulph v. Hodo
... ... such was testator's intention, or, in a proper case, the ... will and the relevant facts show such intention of the ... testator. Wiley et al. v. Murphree, as Ex'r (Ala ... Sup.) 151 So. 869; Montgomery v. Wilson, 189 ... Ala. 209, 66 So. 503; Ralls v. Johnson, 200 Ala ... 178, ... ...