Willamette Woolen Manuf Co v. Bank of British Columbia
Decision Date | 29 November 1886 |
Citation | 30 L.Ed. 384,7 S.Ct. 187,119 U.S. 191 |
Parties | WILLAMETTE WOOLEN MANUF'G CO. v. BANK OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Geo. H. Williams, for appellant, Willamette Woolen Manuf'g Co. J. N. Dolph
This is an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the District of Oregon. The Willamette Woolen Manufacturing Company, the appellant, was incorporated, by an act of the territorial legislature of Oregon, on the seventeenth day of December, 1856, which act is in the following language:
'Section 1. Be it enacted by the legislative assembly of the territory of Oregon that George H. Williams, Alfred Stanton, Joseph Watt, Joseph Holman, Daniel Waldo, William H. Rector, E. M. Barnum, J. G. Wilson, and J. D. Boon, and their associates, stockholders in the joint-stock company known as the 'Willamette Woolen Manufacturing Company,' and their successors, are hereby declared a body corporate and politic by the name and style of the 'Willamette Woolen Manufacturing Company,' for the purpose of creating and improving water-powers and privileges and manufacturing; and the present organization of said joint-stock company shall continue until changed by said corporation.
The present suit was brought by the Bank of British Columbia against that corporation to foreclose a mortgage executed by it on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1875, to secure the payment of promissory notes made by the company, amounting originally to over $80,000, of which, at the time of bringing the suit, only about fifteen thousand remained unpaid. To the bill of foreclosure the defendant, in the circuit court, filed an answer and a plea, The plea, which raises the only question in issue here, is as follows:
'And, for a further defense and plea to said bill of complaint, said defendant, the Willamette Woolen Manufacturing Company, alleges that it is now, and continuously for more than twenty years next last past has been, incorporated under and by virtue of an act of the legislative assembly of the territory of Oregon, passed December 17, 1856, and entitled 'An act to incorporate the Willamette Woolen Manufacturing Company;' that the fifth section of said act provides as follows viz.:
'That the rights and powers enumerated in said section five of said act, and thereby conferred upon defendant, constitute the personal and exclusive franchise of defendant as such corporation, and that said mortgage mentioned in plaintiff's bill of complaint included said franchise, and of right ought by this honorable court to be declared null and void and of no effect, so far as the same...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coleman v. Hagey
...Eq. 847, 42 Atl. 1117; Rochester R. Co. v. Rochester, 205 U. S. 236, 256, 27 Sup. Ct. 469, 51 L. Ed. 784; Willamette Mfg. Co. v. Bank, 119 U. S. 191, 198, 7 Sup. Ct. 137, 30 L. Ed. 384; Great Western M. & M. Co. v. Harris, 128 Fed. 321, 63 C. C. A. Not only do solvent corporations without l......
-
Adams v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Co.
...would have prevented the exemption from passing into the new company. This is universal. Keokuk v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 304-312; Trask v. McGuire, 18 Wall., 391; Shields Ohio, 95 U.S. 320-324; R. R. Co. v. Georgia, 98 U.S. 360, 361, 363, 364; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Palmes, 109 U.S. 248, 254; Me......
-
Coleman v. Hagey
... ... Smith, 170 Mo. 175; Hood v. Bank, 91 N.W. 705; ... Warren v. Moody, 122 U.S ... claim." [Kankakee Woolen Mill Co. v. Kampe, 38 Mo.App ... 229, 234.] ... [ Board of Public Works v. Columbia ... College, 84 U.S. 521, 21 L.Ed. 687.] ... 784, 27 S.Ct ... 469; Willamette Mfg. Co. v. Bank, 119 U.S. 191, 198, ... 30 ... ...
-
Copper Belle Mining Co. v. Costello
... ... bank by the company for that purpose. The matte from ... In ... Willamette Co. v. Bank of British Columbia, 119 U.S ... ...