WILLARD C. BEACH AIR BRUSH COMPANY v. General Motors Corporation, 11292.
| Decision Date | 30 June 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 11292.,11292. |
| Citation | 214 F.2d 664 |
| Parties | WILLARD C. BEACH AIR BRUSH COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Appellant v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Thomas E. Archer, Howard Haskins, Tracy F. Brackett, Edward Fox, Sam N. Heyman, Monte Gaffman, Earl R. Quick, James McEvoy and Edward F. Fisher. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Harold G. Aron, Kew Gardens, N. Y., (Alexander Chananau, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
James D. Carpenter, Jersey City, N. J. (Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, Jersey City, N. J., Drury W. Cooper, New York City, Thomas L. Morrissey, Milton A. Dauber, Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellees.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.
For the earlier history of this case see 88 F.Supp. 849, and 118 F.Supp. 242. On the last appeal we reversed an order of the court below denying a motion by the plaintiff to vacate and set aside a judgment of discontinuance with prejudice because it had been entered pursuant to the written consent of counsel for the plaintiff at a time when the authority of the attorney to act for the plaintiff had been withdrawn. We also directed the court below on remand to permit the filing of the defendants' plea of accord and satisfaction and to hear and dispose of that plea in limine. 3 Cir., 184 F.2d 569. This has been done and a judgment entered in favor of the defendants 118 F. Supp. 242. No error was committed by the court below. The appeal at bar is without merit. It is time that this prolonged litigation was brought to an end. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Harrison v. State
...348, 354, 55 Am.Dec. 191.' Id. at 42. Willard C. Beach Air Brush Co. v. General Motors Corp., 118 F.Supp. 242 (D.N.J.1953), Aff'd 214 F.2d 664 (3rd Cir. 1954), cited the opinion of this Court in Shawmut Mining Co., supra, 'On the other hand, let us give plaintiff the benefit of the remainin......
-
Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Association
...Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 67,873 (1954); Willard C. Beach Air Brush Co. v. General Motors Corp., D.C.D.N.J., 118 F.Supp. 242 (1953), aff'd, 3 Cir., 214 F. 2d 664; Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 13 F.R.D. 438 (1952); Shawmut, Inc. v. American Viscose Corp., D.C.D.Mass., 12 F.R......
-
State v. Funicello
...a bar, had defendant offered him. William C. Beach Air Brush Company v. General Motors Corp., 118 F.Supp. 242 (D.N.J.1953), aff'd 214 F.2d 664 (3 Cir. 1954). In summation the assistant prosecutor asked the rhetorical question: 'Where is the attorney, Mr. Policastro, who saw him? He indeed c......
-
United States v. Grand Jury Investigation
...170 F.2d 627, 628 (4th Cir. 1948); Willard C. Beach Air Brush Co. v. General Motors Corp., 118 F.Supp. 242 (D.N.J.1953), aff'd 214 F.2d 664 (3d Cir. 1954); Magida on Behalf of Vulcan Detinning Co. v. Continental Can Co., 12 F.R.D. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1951). See also Catlog Ass'n v. A. Eberly's Sons......