William Christy, Plaintiff In Error v. Lodovick Alford, Administrator of Henry Bullard, Deceased
Decision Date | 01 December 1854 |
Parties | WILLIAM CHRISTY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LODOVICK P. ALFORD, ADMINISTRATOR OF HENRY D. BULLARD, DECEASED |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial8 cases
-
Bonds v. Smith
...York Life Ins. & Tr. Co., 49 App.D.C. 166, 262 F. 620. 6 Lea v. Polk County Copper Co., 21 How. U.S. 493, 16 L.Ed. 203; Christy v. Alford, 17 How. U.S. 601, 15 L.Ed. 256. See Brumbaugh v. Gompers, 50 App.D.C. 130, 132, 269 F. 472, 474. 7 Doswell v. De La Lanza, 20 How. U. S. 29, 15 L.Ed. 82......
-
Crispen v. Hannavan
...23 Mo. 117; 27 Mo. 412; Tyler Eject. 870, 874, 913; 11 How. 424; 8 Cow. 589, 605; 35 Ill. 392; 18 Iowa, 261; A. K. Marsh. 285; 17 How. 601; Ang. Lim. 409, 417; 3 Washb. Real Prop. 122, 138; 35 Mo. 77. L. H. Waters, for respondent. I. Color of title is that which in appearance is title, but ......
-
Thompson v. Cragg
...years' statute is in analogy to the statute of James, has been expressly ruled by the supreme court of the United States, in Christy v. Alford, 17 How. 601. The analogy being established, or rather the identity being established, the period of time cannot change the rule of interpretation. ......
-
Allen v. Root
...in the earlier case of Charle v. Saffold, 13 Tex. 112-3. And since, as was said by the supreme court of the United States in Christy v. Alford, 17 How. 601, our three years statute of limitations is in analogy to the statute of 21 James I. ch. 16, for limiting actions, and as it is conseque......
Request a trial to view additional results