William Hardeman and Hardeman, Plaintiffs In Error v. Edward Anderson, Defendant
Decision Date | 01 January 1846 |
Parties | WILLIAM HARDEMAN AND D. HARDEMAN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWARD ANDERSON, DEFENDANT |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial13 cases
-
Barnes v. Group Hospital Medical Surgical Insurance Plan
...67 L.Ed. 922 (1923); Ex parte The Milwaukee Railroad Co., 72 U.S. (5 Wall.) 188, 190, 18 L.Ed. 676 (1867); Hardeman v. Anderson, 45 U.S. (4 How.) 640, 642-643, 11 L.Ed. 1138 (1846). Under § 2101(f), as under the All Writs Act and the prior common law, a stay issues not of right but pursuant......
-
New England R. Co. v. Hyde
... ... motion of the plaintiff in error to this court in No. 323, ... for a supersedeas, ... The defendant ... below, now plaintiff in error, in support of ... conditions. Hardeman v. Anderson, 4 How. 640, 11 ... L.Ed. 1138; Ex ... ...
-
Hudson v. Parker
...principles and usages of law. Act Sept. 24, 1789, c. 20, § 14 (1 Stat. 81, 82); Rev. St. § 716; Stockton v. Bishop, 2 How. 74; Hardeman v. Anderson, 4 How. 640; Ex parte Milwaukee R. R., 5 Wall. 188. Under the first judiciary act this court had power 'to make and establish all necessary rul......
-
City of San Antonio v. Hotels.Com
...bonds, tracking the name of a traditional writ that was used to stay the execution of a legal judgment. See, e.g., Hardeman v. Anderson , 4 How. 640, 642, 11 L.Ed. 1138 (1846) (issuing a "writ of supersedeas to stay execution on the judgment"). "A supersedeas bond is a contract by which a s......
Request a trial to view additional results