William Hill, David Porter, and William Walker v. the United States Et Al
Decision Date | 01 January 1850 |
Citation | 9 How. 386,50 U.S. 386,13 L.Ed. 185 |
Parties | WILLIAM J. HILL, DAVID M. PORTER, AND WILLIAM F. WALKER, v. THE UNITED STATES ET AL |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial37 cases
-
Finnell v. Pitts, 8 Div. 133.
... ... permission.' Hill v. U.S., 9 How. 386, 13 L.Ed ... 185; Beers ... decisions by the Supreme Court of the United ... States, Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky, New ... ...
-
McElroy v. Swart
...6 Wheat. 264, 411; U.S. v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 436-444; Cary v. Curtis, 3 How. 236, 245, 256; U.S. v. McLemore, 4 How. 286-289; Hill v. U.S. 9 How. 386, 389; Reeside v. Walker, 11 How. 272, 290; Beers v. Arkansas, How. 527, 529; Nations v. Johnson, 24 How. 195; De Groot v. U.S. 5 Wall. 419, 431;......
-
Moon v. Hines
... ... by Jacob Moon by his next friend against Walker D. Hines, ... Director General of Railroads, ... General of Railroads of the United States, successor in ... office to William G ... 255, 8 Sup.Ct. 502, ... 31 L.Ed. 421; Hill v. U.S., 149 U.S. 593, 13 Sup.Ct ... 1011, 37 ... ...
-
United States v. Lee Kaufman v. Same
...for it given, but it has always been treated as an established doctrine. U. S. v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 436; Same v. McLemore 4 How. 286; Hill v. U. S. 9 How. 386; Nations v. Johnson, 24 How. 195; The Siren, 7 Wall. 152; The Davis, 10 Wall. 15. On the other hadn, while acceding to the general prop......
Request a trial to view additional results