Williams Natural Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, Nos. 89-6209
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before McKAY, LOGAN, and BRORBY; BRORBY |
| Citation | 890 F.2d 255 |
| Parties | WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, Smith Cogeneration, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, and Powersmith Co-Generation Project, a limited partnership, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, v. The CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a Municipal Corporation, and Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Docket Number | Nos. 89-6209,89-6227 and 89-6228 |
| Decision Date | 22 November 1989 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
175 practice notes
-
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. McCarty, No. IP 00-0592-C-H/G.
...in case only as an amicus curiae but was not a party).12 Midwestern also relies heavily on Williams Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma City, 890 F.2d 255 (10th Cir.1989), to avoid Younger abstention. In Williams Natural Gas, an interstate pipeline company had sought FERC approval for a bypass arra......
-
N.J. Conservation Found. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Civ. Action No. 17-11991(FLW)
...that it "would be hard pressed to formulate a doctrine with a more expansive scope." Williams Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City , 890 F.2d 255, 261–62 (10th Cir. 1989).As an example of the NGA's expansive scope, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for lack of juris......
-
Dickerson v. Leavitt Rentals, Civil Action No. 97-2584-EEO.
...that the state court's action was unconstitutional.") (internal quotation omitted); Williams Natural Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, 890 F.2d 255, 264-65 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003, 110 S.Ct. 3236, 111 L.Ed.2d 747 (1990). The Supreme Court has [A] federal claim is inext......
-
Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. 6.04 Acres, No. 16-17503
...LLC , 896 F.3d 624, 626–30 (4th 2018) ; Transwestern Pipeline , 550 F.3d at 778 n.9 ; Williams Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City , 890 F.2d 255, 260–64 (10th Cir. 1989). Defendants did not do so.Nor do the parties disagree that Transcontinental could build a pipeline in the geographic l......
Request a trial to view additional results
174 cases
-
Dickerson v. Leavitt Rentals, Civil Action No. 97-2584-EEO.
...that the state court's action was unconstitutional.") (internal quotation omitted); Williams Natural Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, 890 F.2d 255, 264-65 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003, 110 S.Ct. 3236, 111 L.Ed.2d 747 (1990). The Supreme Court has [A] federal claim is inext......
-
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. McCarty, No. IP 00-0592-C-H/G.
...in case only as an amicus curiae but was not a party).12 Midwestern also relies heavily on Williams Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma City, 890 F.2d 255 (10th Cir.1989), to avoid Younger abstention. In Williams Natural Gas, an interstate pipeline company had sought FERC approval for a bypass arra......
-
Total Gas & Power N. Am., Inc. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-1250
...in the courts of appeals to review FERC's orders, pursuant to [NGA § 19(b)] . . . ."); Williams Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, 890 F.2d 255, 261 (10th Cir. 1989) ("As the statutory language plainly states, the special judicial review provisions of § 19 are exclusive. The provisions ......
-
Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. 6.04 Acres, No. 16-17503
...LLC , 896 F.3d 624, 626–30 (4th 2018) ; Transwestern Pipeline , 550 F.3d at 778 n.9 ; Williams Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Oklahoma City , 890 F.2d 255, 260–64 (10th Cir. 1989). Defendants did not do so.Nor do the parties disagree that Transcontinental could build a pipeline in the geographic l......
Request a trial to view additional results