Williams v. Cox, 8113.

Decision Date13 September 1965
Docket NumberNo. 8113.,8113.
Citation350 F.2d 847
PartiesGeorge WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Harold A. COX, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Brooke Wunnicke, Cheyenne, Wyo., for appellant (Williams, Wunnicke & Fennell, Cheyenne, Wyo., on the brief).

L. D. Harris, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee (Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen. of New Mexico, on the brief).

Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the denial of the appellant's petition for habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. The appellant is serving a sentence of not less than one nor more than twenty years at hard labor in the New Mexico State Penitentiary on his plea of guilty to an information charging him with sodomy.

The record shows the facts to be as follows: On May 13, 1957, the appellant was brought before the New Mexico District Court on an information charging him with three counts of sodomy. The assistant district attorney stated to appellant that he had been charged with three counts of sodomy and that each charge was a penitentiary offense. He then asked him if he understood the charge. The appellant replied that he did. The judge then asked him how he was going to plead and he entered a plea of not guilty. The court thereupon appointed counsel to represent appellant. Although counsel conferred with appellant only a short time, he was also representing him in another matter before the court, a rape charge, and was therefore familiar with his background and intelligence.

Appellant testified in the lower court that counsel told appellant he thought he could "get out pretty light" and gave him a document to sign. Apparently this document constituted a plea of guilty. Appellant testified that it was not read to the appellant nor were its contents explained to him, but he signed with an "X" on the line designated to him.

Following the recess during which counsel conferred with appellant appellant's counsel informed the court that the appellant wished to withdraw his plea of not guilty and enter a plea of guilty to count one of the information. The assistant district attorney then moved to dismiss the remaining two counts of the information and the rape charge. Counsel then addressed the court:

"If it please the Court, before sentencing him, I have talked with this defendant on several occasions in connection with the charge which has now been dismissed, and learned from the defendant that back in the `thirties he\'s had infractions of the law. I have learned that he has been a patient, with parole, of the Texas State Mental Hospital on two occasions. I have learned that he has been in the mental institution in Las Vegas where he remained for a short time. However, the defendant at this time unquestionably understands these charges. His rights have been fully explained to him, his constitutional rights, his rights of defense, and he has expressed a desire to enter this plea, in which his counsel is in agreement with."

The court thereupon sentenced the appellant.

The sole question raised by appellant below and in this appeal is whether he was accorded his constitutional right to assistance of counsel. Appellant's brief specifically states that no contention is raised herein as to competency of appointed counsel or that he in any way...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Tahl, In re
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 7 November 1969
    ...him of the consequences of the plea entered.' (Italics added.) (Id. at pp. 735--736, 323 P.2d at p. 140; see also Williams v. Cox (10th Cir. 1965) 350 F.2d 847, 849; United States v. Von Der Heide (D.D.C.1959) 169 F.Supp. 560, Thus the crucial factor has generally been the presence of couns......
  • U.S. v. Decoster
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 19 October 1976
    ...372 U.S. 978, 83 S.Ct. 1110, 10 L.Ed.2d 143 (1963); United States v. Riebold, supra note 34, 557 F.2d at 702-703; Williams v. Cox, 350 F.2d 847, 849 (10th Cir. 1965).130 See text supra at notes 6-19.131 See notes 6-13 supra and accompanying text.132 See notes 34-35 supra and accompanying te......
  • Busby v. Holman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 31 January 1966
    ...was such as to reduce the trial to a farce or a sham. Otherwise, they should be dismissed." As Judge Seth said in Williams v. Cox, 10 Cir. 1965, 350 F.2d 847, 849: "* * * Although counsel conferred with appellant only briefly in the instant case, the record shows he was acquainted with him ......
  • State ex rel. Condon v. Erickson, No. 10767
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 15 December 1970
    ...sentenced by the State Court.' In our opinion the record supports this finding under principles set forth in Nachtigall. 6 In Williams v. Cox, 10 Cir., 350 F.2d 847, where a claim was made of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court 'No particular ritual is required in advising a crimin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT