Williams v. Graham
| Decision Date | 01 October 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. 11–10433.,11–10433. |
| Citation | 184 L.Ed.2d 77,133 S.Ct. 155 (Mem),568 U.S. 843 |
| Parties | Darren WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Harold GRAHAM, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
831 cases
-
Morris v. Mitchell
... ... [Supreme Court] decisions as of the time of the relevant ... state-court decision.” Williams v. Taylor , 529 ... U.S. 362, 412 (2000) (O'Connor, J., majority opinion ... about part II of the Court's opinion) ... ...
-
Hodges v. Hamm
... ... Supreme Court's] decisions as of the time of the relevant ... state-court decisions.” Williams v. Taylor , ... 529 U.S. 362, 412 (2000). A state court decision is ... “contrary to” clearly established federal law ... “if ... ...
-
Rivera v. Emmons
... ... "again, and again." ( Id. at 166.) ... During ... the State's rebuttal, Dr. Hayden Williams and other ... experts contradicted Dr. Sachy's diagnosis and ... conclusions. (Doc. 30-4, p. 6.) Dr. Williams explained the ... ...
-
Calhoun v. Raybon
... ... Court's decisions as of the time of the relevant ... state-court decision.” Williams v. Taylor , 529 ... U.S. 362, 412 (2000). “Contrary to” federal law ... means the state court reached “a conclusion opposite to ... ...
Get Started for Free