Williams v. Kozlowski
| Decision Date | 06 December 1933 |
| Docket Number | 239 |
| Citation | Williams v. Kozlowski, 169 A. 884, 313 Pa. 226 (Pa. 1933) |
| Parties | Williams v. Kozlowski et al., Appellants |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Appeal, No. 239, March T., 1933, by defendants, Brownie Kozlowski et ux., from judgment of C.P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1931, No. 2512, in case of Flora Williams v. Brownie Kozlowski et ux. et al. Judgment affirmed.
Therefore the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
OPINION
By a stipulation filed in the above entitled case it was agreed that the decision of the above appeal should follow that of the appeal of the City of Pittsburgh in the same case, indexed to No. 238, March Term, 1933.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
McArthur's Appeal.
...which could not have been done prior to the passage of the sci. fa. act providing for joining additional defendants: Williams v. Kozlowski, 313 Pa. 219, 226, 169 A. 148; Brennan v. Huber, 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 299, 308-309, 171 A. 122. However, the old distinction on which the former rule wa......
-
Toth
v.
O'Brien et al.
...to him for the damage done to him, without regard to whether all defendants were liable because of their own conduct (Williams v. Kozlowski et ux., 313 Pa. 219), or whether one of the defendants was vicariously liable for the tort of his codefendant: East Broad Top Transit Co. v. Flood, 326......
-
Fishbein
v.
Carborundum Company et al.
...language of the statute before quoted, and plaintiff's recovery, if any, will properly be had against both defendants: Williams v. Kozlowski et al., 313 Pa. 219. Section 13 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P.L. 483, as amended by the Act of April 4, 1929, P.L. 140, provides that the def......