Williams v. Miami-Dade County Public Health, 3D07-2964.
| Decision Date | 02 September 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D07-2964.,3D07-2964. |
| Citation | 17 So.3d 859 |
| Parties | Mary WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST d/b/a Jackson Memorial Hospital, The University of Miami, Luke Yeung, M.D., and Manuel Arce, M.D., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Goldberg & Rosen and Glen Z. Goldberg; Wasson & Associates, and Roy D. Wasson, Miami, for appellant.
Abadin Cook and Kimberly A. Cook, Erin E. Dardis, and Aldo M. Leiva; R.A. Cuevas, Jr. and Stephen A. Stieglitz, Miami, for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
Mary Williams appeals from an order granting the defendants', Miami-Dade County Public Health Trust d/b/a Jackson Memorial Hospital, The University of Miami, Luke Yeung, M.D., and Manuel Arce, M.D., motion to dismiss her complaint for fraud upon the court. We affirm.
The trial court dismissed Williams' medical malpractice action in its entirety because, during the discovery process, Williams "engaged in a clear and convincing scheme calculated to interfere with the trial court's impartial ability to adjudicate [the] matter." In support of this conclusion, the trial court specifically found that: (1) Williams intentionally failed to disclose prior medical problems and symptoms in her deposition and interrogatory answers; (2) Williams intentionally failed to disclose her involvement in several car accidents that predated the surgery; (3) Williams intentionally failed to disclose that she had applied for disability benefits prior to the surgery; (4) Williams was not truthful with her treating physicians; and (5) Williams' argument that her failures to disclose were caused by memory loss attributable to the defendants' actions was incredible.
We review the trial court's dismissal for fraud on the court for an abuse of discretion. Ramey v. Haverty Furniture Cos., 993 So.2d 1014, 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Papadopoulos v. Cruise Ventures Three Corp., 974 So.2d 418, 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). However, given the severity of the sanction of dismissal, this standard has been somewhat narrowed in application. See Ramey, 993 So.2d at 1018 ().
In this case, the record...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Empire World Towers, LLC v. CDR CRéances, S.A.S.
...pleadings for fraud upon the court is reviewed under a “narrowed” abuse of discretion standard. Williams v. Miami–Dade Cnty. Pub. Health Trust, 17 So.3d 859, 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). The proponent of a motion to strike pleadings must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, “that a party has......
-
Middleton v. Hager
...review the trial court's determination in such a case under a narrowed abuse of discretion standard. Williams v. Miami–Dade Cnty. Public Health Trust, 17 So.3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that, "given the severity of the sanction of dismissal, [the abuse of discretion] standard has been......
-
Faddis v. City of Homestead, 3D12–3248.
...Empire World Towers, LLC v. CDR Créances, S.A.S., 89 So.3d 1034, 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (citing Williams v. Miami–Dade Cnty. Pub. Health Trust, 17 So.3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)). The record contains competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's determination, by clear and conv......
-
Malzone v. Uribe
...Ronald I. Strauss, for appellees.Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.PER CURIAM.Affirmed. See Williams v. Miami–Dade Cty. Public Health Tr., 17 So.3d 859, 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion when its sanctions order was well-supported by the evidence);......