Williams v. Nierenberg
Citation | 115 N.W. 510 |
Parties | WILLIAMS v. NIERENBERG et al. |
Decision Date | 21 February 1908 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota |
Appellant seeks to have respondent adjudged an involuntary trustee of certain real property. The complaint alleges that the property formerly belonged to one Charles Williams, plaintiff's father, who died in March, 1897, the respondent being the plaintiff's mother and widow of the deceased; that nearly a year prior to the death of Charles Williams the property was sold at foreclosure sale to the Middlesex Banking Company, who assigned the certificate of sale to the Farm Land Company, and, no redemption having been made, the latter company acquired title to the premises through such foreclosure proceedings. Respondent thereafter purchased said land from the land company, and she is sought to be charged as an involuntary trustee thereof to the extent of a one-third interest therein, upon the theory that she, as natural guardian of plaintiff, committed a breach of duty in not redeeming from such foreclosure sale. The complaint contains allegations as to fraudulent conduct and breach of duty on respondent's part, but such allegations are mere conclusions of law, and have no effect. The complaint contains no allegation that respondent had any trust funds or any funds in her possession or control with which to effect such redemption, and the complaint is devoid of any tender or offer on plaintiff's part to do equity by reimbursing respondent for any portion of the amount which would have been necessary to effect such redemption, or any portion of the purchase price paid by respondent for said land. Held, that the trial court properly sustained defendant's demurrer to the complaint.
Appeal from District Court, Griggs County; E. T. Burke, Judge.
Action by Fred H. Williams against Eva Nierenberg and Jennie Nierenberg. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.A. M. Baldwin, for appellant. Bartlett & Gladstone, for respondent Eva Nierenberg.
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's amended complaint. Such complaint, when stripped of its legal conclusions, is in substance as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reitsch v. McCarty
...47 Mich. 309, 11 N.W. 172; Bradley v. Larkin, 5 Kan.App. 11, 47 P. 315; Veeder v. Veeder, 141 Iowa 495, 120 N.W. 61; Williams v. Nierenberg, N.D. , 115 N.W. 510. debtor is an indispensable party to a suit to set aside a fraudulent conveyance. 5 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 539-541. "A trustee, who is als......
-
Comer v. Thompson
... ... 148 U.S. 573-580; Russell v. Blake, 2 Pick. 505; ... Tatum v. McLellan, 56 Miss. 352; Thompson v ... Thompson, 16 Wis. 91; Hughes v. Williams (Va.) 38 S.E ... "There ... is no need of equitable proceedings to set aside a deed ... executed in breach of trust." Bourquin ... Anthes v. Schrouder ... (Neb.) 92 N.W. 196; May, Fraud. Conv. 689; ... Richardson v. Welch, 47 Mich. 309; Williams v ... Nierenberg (N.D.) 115 N.W. 510 ... When ... one gives his agent ambiguous instructions which the latter ... executes in good faith ... ...
-
Mattauch v. Riddell Automobile Co.
... ... some delay. It also appears that at Casey the machine was ... delivered to one Williams by plaintiff's direction, and ... that defendant's representative was later called to that ... place to make further repairs on the machine ... ...
- Mattauch v. Riddell Auto. Co.