Williams v. Pryor, 99-10798

Decision Date12 October 2000
Docket NumberNo. 99-10798,99-10798
Citation229 F.3d 1331
Parties(11th Cir. 2000) Sherri WILLIAMS, B.J. Bailey, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Bill PRYOR, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE SUBSTITUTED OPINION AT 240 F.3d 944.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Peek-a-Boo Lounge of Bradenton v. Manatee County, 02-12281.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 15, 2003
    ...1296 (11th Cir.2002). The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review. See, e.g., Williams v. Pryor, 229 F.3d 1331, 1334 (11th Cir.2000); United States v. Harden, 37 F.3d 595, 602 (11th III. DISCUSSION A. Summary of Supreme Court's "Secondary Effects" Juris......
  • Lawrence v State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 15, 2001
    ...511 (1976). For the foregoing reasons, we hold the Alabama statute challenged in this case has a rational basis. Williams v. Pryor, 229 F.3d 1331, 1339 (11th Cir. 2000). 17. Bestiality, however, was a capital offense whether committed by a man or a woman. The Laws and Liberties of Massachus......
  • Ranch House Inc. v. Amerson, No. 98-6857
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • January 17, 2001
    ...case is undisputed. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review. See, e.g., Williams v. Pryor, 229 F.3d 1331, 1334 (11th Cir.2000); United States v. Harden, 37 F.3d 595, 602 (11th IV. We first address the constitutionality of 200.11's ban on the display......
  • Quetgles v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 28, 2003
    ...`[w]hether a statute is constitutional is determined in large part by the level of scrutiny applied by the courts.' [Williams v. Pryor, 229 F.3d 1331, 1334 (11th Cir.2000)]. The Supreme Court in [City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000),] recently add......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT