Williams v. State, 6 Div. 569
Citation | 258 Ala. 638,64 So.2d 617 |
Decision Date | 16 April 1953 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 569 |
Parties | WILLIAMS v. STATE. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
M. B. Grace and Kelvie Applebaum, Birmingham, for petitioner.
Si Garrett, Atty. Gen., and Robt. Straub, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
The petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals must be stricken because not made on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Roanoke-Goodwater Pine Co. v. Cannon, 256 Ala. 404, 55 So.2d 137; Morgan Plan Co., Inc. v. Beverly, 255 Ala. 235, 51 So.2d 179; Mann v. Department of Industrial Relations, 255 Ala. 201, 50 So.2d 786; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244.
Petition stricken.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hochman v. State, 1 Div. 700
...249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30; Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Williams v. State, 258 Ala. 638, 64 So.2d 617. Petition LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur. ...
-
Accardo v. State, 7 Div. 414
...391, 37 So.2d 440; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Bray v. State, 257 Ala. 111, 57 So.2d 555; Williams v. State, 258 Ala. 638, 64 So.2d 617; Conley v. State, 265 Ala. 450, 92 So.2d 9; Hochman v. State, 265 Ala. 404, 91 So.2d 502. (2) The record before us does not d......
-
Stinson v. State, 8 Div. 110
...270 Ala. 589, 120 So.2d 751; Houston v. State, 265 Ala. 588, 93 So.2d 439; Conley v. State, 265 Ala. 450, 92 So.2d 9; Williams v. State, 258 Ala. 638, 64 So.2d 617; Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357, and authorities cited in those As we see it, nothing would be gained by discussi......
-
Bradfield v. State, 8 Div. 239
...... The defendant was convicted under Count 6 of the indictment, which is as follows:. 'Count 6. The Grand Jury of said County further charge, ......