Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

• Decision Date: 18 February 1969
• Docket Number: No. A--1786,A--1786
• Citation: Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 250 A.2d 155, 104 N.J.Super. 403 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1969)
• Parties: Robert E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State ofIllinois, Defendant-Respondent.
• Court: New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Page 403

104 N.J.Super. 403

250 A.2d 155

Robert E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State ofIllinois, Defendant-Respondent.

No. A--1786.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued Jan. 20, 1969.

Decided Feb. 18, 1969.

Charles L. Morgan, West Long Branch, for appellant.

Ralph W. Campbell, Asbury Park, for respondent(Campbell, Mangini, Foley, Lee & Murphy, Asbury Park, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Salvest in the Law Division, 99 N.J.Super. 377, 240 A.2d 38(1968).

Additionally, the insurance policy issued by defendant under 'Definitions' provides: 'Damages--wherever used with respect to coverage A (Bodily Injury Liability) includes damages for Care and loss of service,'(Emphasis added).This definition clearly establishes that a husband's Per quod claim is included in the $25,000 policy limitation 'for all damages arising out of...