Williams v. State of Maryland
Decision Date | 04 April 1974 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 71-160-K. |
Citation | 375 F. Supp. 745 |
Parties | Robert Lee WILLIAMS #105750 v. STATE OF MARYLAND. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland |
Nevett Steele, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for petitioner.
Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., of Md., Clarence W. Sharp and Donald R. Stutman, Asst. Attys. Gen., of Md., Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
Robert Lee Williams, presently confined in the Maryland State Penitentiary, and represented herein by counsel appointed by this Court, seeks habeas corpus relief for the first time. On June 15, 1963 Williams was arrested on various charges including, inter alia, assault with intent to murder, none of which charges were factually related to those which resulted in the conviction attacked herein. Following his June 15, 1963 arrest, Williams was placed in custody. That custody has continued uninterruptedly since June 15, 1963. On November 26, 1963, Williams was served with an additional arrest warrant charging him with murder.
On January 23, 1964, after a trial before Judge J. Harold Grady in the Criminal Court of Baltimore commencing on January 21, 1964, Williams was convicted on the assault charge. Six days later, on January 29, 1964, Williams' jury trial on the murder charge, Judge Charles D. Harris presiding, began in the Criminal Court of Baltimore. On January 31, 1964 Williams was found guilty in that trial of first degree murder and on May 13, 1965 he was sentenced to a life term by Judge Harris in connection therewith. On that latter date, Williams was also sentenced in the assault case to a term of fifteen years by Judge Grady, that sentence to be served consecutively with the life sentence imposed in the murder case.
Timely appeals to the Court of Appeals of Maryland were noted in each case. During the pendency of those appeals the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed its opinion in Schowgurow v. State, 240 Md. 121, 213 A.2d 475 (1965).1 On January 11, 1966, both of the cases involving Williams were remanded by the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in the light of Schowgurow. In accordance with those remands, on March 10, 1966 Williams' motions to dismiss the indictments in the two cases were granted. On June 28, 1966 Williams was reindicted on both the assault and the murder charges.
More than two years after the June, 1966 indictment was returned, Williams was tried on the assault with intent to murder charge in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and found guilty thereof on October 8, 1968. On that same date, the trial judge, Judge Solomon Liss, sentenced Williams to fifteen years, said term to commence as of the time of Williams' arrest on June 15, 1963. Williams' said assault conviction was affirmed on appeal by the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland on June 6, 1969. Subsequently, the Court of Appeals of Maryland declined further discretionary review. Williams does not in any way contest herein the validity of his confinement under the sentence imposed by Judge Liss.
On July 17, 1969, nearly three years and one month after his reindictment for murder, Williams' jury trial before Chief Judge Dulany Foster commenced. On July 18, 1969 the jury returned a verdict of guilty of first degree murder (without capital punishment); and on July 23, 1969, after denial of Williams' motion for a new trial, a life sentence was imposed by Judge Foster, said sentence to begin at the expiration of the fifteen-year sentence Williams was then serving for assault. On August 4, 1970 Williams' 1969 murder conviction was affirmed in a per curiam opinion by the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. That Court, however, remanded Williams' case in order that his commitment might be corrected so as to afford him credit for the time served between the date of his original conviction for murder and the date on which his original indictment was dismissed pursuant to Schowgurow. Thereafter, the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in the exercise of its discretion, refused to undertake any further review.
In its unreported August 4, 1970 per curiam opinion, the Court of Special Appeals (at pp. 2-6) summarized the testimony in Williams' July 1969 murder trial as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Salzmann
...be made to obtain witnesses from foreign jurisdictions. Cf. Poe v. Turner, 490 F.2d 329, 331-32 (10th Cir. 1974); Williams v. Maryland, 375 F.Supp. 745, 755-56 (D.Md.1974) (state failed to pursue leads into neighboring jurisdiction); United States v. Singleton, 460 F.2d 1148, 1152-53 (2d Ci......
-
Mildner v. Gulotta
...255 (1968); Berger v. California, 393 U.S. 314, 315, 89 S.Ct. 540, 541, 21 L.Ed.2d 508 (1969). See also Williams v. State of Maryland, 375 F. Supp. 745, 756-57 (D.Md. 1974). Speaking of a decision on a motion to suppress, the Ninth Circuit noted the dangers in separating the person who sees......
-
State v. Anderson
...there was no attempt to bring them into the state for trial, E. g., Barber v. Page, supra, State v. Smyth, supra, Williams v. State of Maryland, 375 F.Supp. 745 (D.C.Md.1974); Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.App., 1978); State v. Mims, 222 Kan. 335, 564 P.2d 531 (1977); State v. Wait......
-
Sheffield v. Lack, Civ. A. No. 3:87-0779.
...about a crime which is `a felony, infamous crime, petit larceny, or a crime involving moral turpitude.'" Williams v. State of Maryland, 375 F.Supp. 745, 753 (D.C.Md. 1974). This issue has no Mr. Sheffield claims also that his trial Court erred in refusing to sustain his objection to the pro......