Williams v. Trans World Airlines
| Decision Date | 06 May 1977 |
| Citation | 374 A.2d 486,149 N.J.Super. 585 |
| Parties | Ava WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES and Transport Workers of America Union, the Airlines Stewards and Stewardesses Association, Local 550, Defendants. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court |
Jeffrey K. McKinley, Newark, for plaintiff (Tutela & McKinley, Newark, attorneys).
Louis John Dughi, Jr., Newark, for defendant Trans World Airlines (Shanley & Fisher, Newark, attorneys).
No one appeared for defendant, Transport Workers of America Union, The Airlines Stewards and Stewardesses Ass'n, Local 550.
This novel matter comes before the court on an order to show cause for the release to plaintiff of the name and address of the author of a letter of complaint about plaintiff to her employer.
Plaintiff was employed by defendant Trans World Airlines as a probationary flight attendant. She was discharged in September 1976 after defendant had received a letter of complaint from a passenger on the airplane which included the following language: * * *'
The time of the alleged incident was August 1, 1976, while the flight in question was grounded by bad weather at Colorado Springs, Colorado. The flight originated in Chicago, Illinois, and the destination was Denver, Colorado.
It is conceded that one of the factors considered in reaching the decision to discharge was the letter in question. Plaintiff was given a copy of the letter after deletion of the author's name. Plaintiff does not question the propriety of the discharge in this action but here seeks to compel defendant Trans World Airlines to divulge the identity of the author of the letter.
Employment was pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Article 1 of the agreement reads in pertinent part:
All TWA flights flown by the Company which require Flight Attendants on board the aircraft shall be operated in accordance with the provisions of the current Working Agreement, and all Flight Attendants employed by the Company shall be subject to the provisions of the current Working Agreement. (Agreement between Trans World Airlines, Inc. and The Flight Attendants in the service of Trans World Airlines, Inc. as represented by The Transport Workers Union of America, AFL--CIO signed July 29, 1976.)
An employee will receive a copy of any record placed in the employee's file which is a criticism or reprimand of the employee and a copy of any supervisor's in-flight reports. In addition, the Company will provide a copy of letter of complaint to the affected Flight Attendant after deleting the identification of the sender. In no event, will a supervisor use written information which involves an employee's on-board performance, or any criticism in assessing discipline if the written report has not been previously discussed with the employee.' (Id., Article 19(C)).
Plaintiff characterizes the letter in question as accusing her of acts of prostitution. (Defendant does not and merely refers to the letter language.)
Plaintiff asserts that the letter is 'slanderous in nature and seeks the identity of her accuser'; that she is entitled to the information, and that any collective agreement barring same is contrary to public policy and deprives her of 'constitutional' rights.
Defendant opposes and argues that pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between Trans World Airlines and its flight attendants, defendant was to furnish the letter only 'after deleting the identification of the sender.' Article 19(c). Thus, it is urged, plaintiff 'waived' her rights to such information and, in effect, waived the right to sue patrons who chose to criticize the performance by written complaint.
It is urged by plaintiff that the withholding of the information (the name of the author):
* * * will violate both public policy and the fundamental rights of the plaintiff. No man can be condemded (sic) in our law without hearing the witnesses (sic) against him, and having an opportunity to cross-examine them. Perine v. Van Note, 4 N.J.L. 146 (Sup.1818).
Finally, plaintiff urges that this 'fundamental right' was not waived; that there was a closed shop; that s...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
New Jersey Div. of Youth and Family Services v. v. K
...supplied]. The Sixth Amendment right of confrontation is not applicable to civil proceedings. See Williams v. Trans World Airlines, 149 N.J.Super. 585, 589, 374 A.2d 486 (Ch. Div.1977); M. v. F., 95 N.J.Super. 165, 172, 230 A.2d 192 (J. & D.R. Ct.1967). "The right of confrontation, although......
-
Porter & Ripa Associates, Inc. v. 200 Madison Ave. Real Estate Group
...124 (1972); Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 378-379, 91 S.Ct. 780, 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1970), and Williams v. Trans World Airlines, 149 N.J.Super. 585, 589, 374 A.2d 486 (Ch.Div.1977). However, it is just as firmly established that "every reasonable presumption should be indulged against *......
-
Gorham v. City of Kansas City, 49483
...255 (1977); Board of Ed. of City of Rochester v. Nyquist, 62 App.Div. 265, 404 N.Y.S.2d 710 (1978); Williams v. Trans World Airlines, 149 N.J.Super. 585, 374 A.2d 486 (1977); and Cary v. Bd. of Ed. of Adams-Arapahoe, Etc., 427 F.Supp. 945 The collective bargaining agreement before us in thi......
- Garramone v. Caputo