Williams v. U.S., 78-3797

Decision Date22 January 1981
Docket NumberNo. 78-3797,78-3797
Citation634 F.2d 894
Parties81-1 USTC P 13,388 Mrs. Claude M. WILLIAMS, Individually, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

M. Carr Ferguson, Gilbert S. Rothenberg, Asst. Attys. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Chief, App. Sec., James A. Riedy, Richard Farber, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Robert Lee Bobbitt, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., Douglass D. Hearne, Austin, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before WISDOM, RONEY and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The controlling issue in this federal estate tax refund case is whether the pre-death incompetence of a decedent holding a general power of appointment permits exclusion from her estate of the property subject to that power. This Court has just decided that such property is includable in the decedent's estate under section 2041 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 2041. Estate of Gilchrist v. Commissioner, 630 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1980). We therefore reverse the district court's decision for the taxpayer on the Government's appeal. That decision also resolves against the taxpayer a cross-appeal seeking to exclude from the estate the settlement paid to a stepson for his claim against the estate.

The decedent was left a life interest coupled with an inter vivos general power of appointment in all of her husband's property in 1957. In 1971 she was adjudicated incompetent by a Texas County court and remained so until her death in 1972. She never exercised her general power of appointment over the life estate.

In calculating estate taxes, the executrix excluded from the estate the property in the life estate. After a deficiency assessment by the Internal Revenue Commissioner, the tax was paid and this refund suit instituted. The district court, on cross motions for summary judgment, ruled for the taxpayer.

The case of Estate of Gilchrist v. Commissioner, 630 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1980), decided subsequent to the district court's decision in this case, and submitted to another panel of this Court prior to this submission, requires reversal. Section 2041 provides that a decedent's gross estate includes the value of all property over which the decedent has a general power of appointment at the time of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Estate of Amundson
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • February 14, 2001
    ...v. Commissioner, 630 F.2d 340, 345 (5th Cir.1980); Boeving v. United States, 650 F.2d 493, 495 (8th Cir.1981); Williams v. United States, 634 F.2d 894 (5th Cir.1981); Estate of Rosenblatt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 633 F.2d 176, 179-80 (10th Cir.1980); Estate of Alperstein v. Comm......
  • Matter of Estate of Amundsun, 21015
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • February 14, 2001
    ...of Gilchrist v. Commissioner, 630 F.2d 340, 345 (5thCir 1980); Boeving v. United States, 650 F.2d 493, 495 (8thCir 1981); Williams v. United States, 634 F.2d 894 (5thCir 1981); Estate of Rosenblatt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 633 F.2d 176, 179-80 (10th Cir 1980); Estate of Alperste......
  • Estate of Whitlock v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • United States Tax Court
    • May 17, 1982
    ...Cir. 1979), cert. denied sub nom. Greenburg v. Commissioner, 446 U.S. 918 (1980); Williams v. United States 81-1 USTC ¶ 13,388, 634 F. 2d 894 (5th Cir. 1981); Estate of Rosenblatt v. Commissioner 80-2 USTC ¶ 13,374, 633 F. 2d 176 (10th Cir. 1980), affg. on other grounds a memorandum opinion......
  • Boeving v. U.S., 80-1674
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • June 17, 1981
    ...All have agreed that incompetency does not operate to nullify the power for purposes of applying IRC § 2041. See Williams v. United States, 634 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1981); Estate of Gilchrist v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 630 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1980); Estate of Rosenblatt v. Commission......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT