Williams v. Williams, 18420
| Decision Date | 18 May 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 18420,18420 |
| Citation | 123 Ind.App. 495,112 N.E.2d 305 |
| Parties | WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS et al. |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
F. Kenneth Dempsey, South Bend, William N. Kenefick and Paul F. Jackson, Michigan City, for appellant.
Krueger & Fox, Michigan City, Fred H. Stafford, Marked Tree, Ark., for appellees.
Appellant filed her brief in this court April 17, 1953. Appellee Williams has filed his petition to affirm the judgment because appellant's brief does not comply with rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court of Indiana.
An examination of appellant's brief discloses it is not indexed; it does not set out a concise statement of the record or the assignment of errors here. This court could not determine whether or not appellant has properly presented a question without searching the record. Since the filing of appellee's motion, appellant has neither filed a request to amend her brief nor made any reply to said motion. While we always prefer to decide cases on their merits we may not do so when an appellant fails to comply with the rules of the Supreme Court.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nelson v. Board of Zoning Appeals of City of Indianapolis, 18997
...v. Witte et al., 1953, 123 Ind.App. 644, 113 N.E.2d 166. Appellees, in support of their position, cite the case of Williams v. Williams, 1953, 123 Ind.App. 495, 112 N.E.2d 305, and Hughes et al. v. State Bank of West Terre Haute, 1954, 124 Ind.App. 511, 117 N.E.2d 563. These were cases wher......
-
Hayes v. Pennick
...judgment will be affirmed.' Hughes v. State Bank of W. Terre Haute (1954), 124 Ind.App. 511, 512, 117 N.E.2d 563; Williams v. Williams (1953), 123 Ind.App. 495, 112 N.E.2d 305; Witte v. Witte (1953), 123 Ind.App. 644, 646, 113 N.E.2d 166; Branson v. Branson (1935), 100 Ind.App. 81, 193 N.E.......
-
Joslin v. Ketcham, 19125
... ... Williams v ... Williams, 1953, 123 Ind.App. 495, 112 N.E.2d 305; Milburn v. Waggoner, 1932, 94 Ind.App ... ...
-
Livingston v. Livingston
...v. Waggoner (1932) 94 Ind.App. 247, 250, 180 N.E. 606; Howard v. Palmer (1932) 94 Ind.App. 80, 179 N.E. 732; Williams v. Williams (1953) 123 Ind.App. 495, 112 N.E.2d 305; Hickey v. Estate of Hickey, etc. (1956) 127 Ind.App. 9, 13, 136 N.E.2d In the recent case of Board of Med. Regist. and E......