Williams v. Wisowaty
| Decision Date | 04 November 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 54934.,54934. |
| Citation | 276 N.E.2d 424,2 Ill. App.3d 400 |
| Parties | CATHERINE E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARRY WISOWATY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Moltz and Wexler, of Chicago, (Leon C. Wexler, of counsel,) for appellant.
Clarence J. Walsh, of Chicago, for appellee.
Abstract of Decision.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
First State Bank at Gallup v. Clark
...the note's contract of payment, constitute as much a part of the note as if they were incorporated on its face. Williams v. Wisowaty, 2 Ill.App.3d 400, 276 N.E.2d 424 (1971). Counsel argue that § 3-119 applies and allows incorporating other documents to remove the defects on the face of the......
-
Bernard Klibanow & Co. v. Shafer
... ... Tuso v. Green, 194 Cal. 574, 229 P. 327 (1924); Twisselmann v. Cohn, 57 Cal.App.2d 987, 136 P.2d 33 (1943); Williams v. Rush, 134 Cal.App. 554, 25 P.2d 888 (1933). In the present case there was no superseding instrument covering the sale of the property. Shafer ... ...
-
Robbins v. Avara
... ... Civil judgments may be reversed if they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. (Williams v. Wisowaty, 2 [28 Ill.App.3d 295] Ill.App.3d 400, 276 N.E.2d 424 (abst.).) However, the law is clear that the trier of fact resolves factual ... ...