Willow City Farmers Elevator v. Thompson, 9416

Decision Date19 December 1977
Docket NumberNo. 9416,9416
PartiesWILLOW CITY FARMERS ELEVATOR, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Hayden THOMPSON, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PIONEER STATE BANK, Roger B. West, Receiver and Trustee of the Pioneer State Bank, and State Bank of Towner, Third-Party Defendant (Not Parties to Appeal). Civ.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

Richard P. Olson of Pringle & Herigstad, Minot, for plaintiff and appellee, on briefs.

Kermit Edward Bye, Fargo, on Stipulation for Hayden Thompson.

SAND, Justice.

The motion to dismiss the appeal was presented on briefs in this case without oral argument.

Hayden Thompson, the defendant and third-party plaintiff, appealed from a summary judgment against himself dated 5 May 1977 awarding $30,814.35 to Willow City Farmers Elevator. The appeal was filed with the district clerk of court on 16 May 1977.

Willow City Farmers Elevator, on 14 November 1977, filed a motion with this Court pursuant to North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure 12(c) to dismiss Thompson's appeal on the ground that Thompson merely served and filed a notice of appeal but did not timely transmit the record or pay the required docket fee and has not taken any steps required to complete the appeal.

The docket fee was paid and the record was transmitted and filed with this Court on 17 November 1977. The hearing on the motion to dismiss was scheduled for 6 December 1977.

Willow City Farmers Elevator filed a brief in support of its motion but Hayden Thompson did not file a brief resisting the motion.

On 5 December 1977 our clerk of court received a letter from counsel for Willow City Farmers Elevator advising that Thompson's attorney, in a telephone conversation, stated to him that he did not plan to contest the motion to dismiss and would notify the court of his intent.

On 12 December 1977 the clerk of court received a letter from counsel for Willow City Farmers Elevator stating that the stipulation of dismissal would not be signed and presented to the Court. (However, on 15 December 1977 the clerk of the North Dakota Supreme Court received a stipulation for dismissal executed on behalf of the appellee and the appellant.) Counsel further indicated that had the stipulation been presented prior to the briefing of the motion for dismissal he would have signed it.

In South and South, husband and wife, v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK), Burlington Northern Railroad, Inc., City of Larimore, County of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1982
    ...reiterated our preference to reach the merits of cases. See State v. Packineau, 270 N.W.2d 336 (N.D.1978), and Willow City Farmers Elevator v. Thompson, 261 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1977), and cases cited therein. The factors which enter into our evaluation are expressed in those cases. We add the f......
  • Willow City Farmers Elevator v. Vogel, Vogel, Brantner & Kelly, 9416-A
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1978
    ...same day, July 8, the garnishment of the account was dismissed. On December 19, 1977, we dismissed Thompson's appeal. Willow City Farmers Elevator v. Thompson, 261 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1977). The record does not disclose that a levy of the execution was ever accomplished; however, we know that t......
  • Jostad v. Jostad, 9639
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • October 25, 1979
    ...reiterated our preference to reach the merits of cases. See State v. Packineau, 270 N.W.2d 336 (N.D.1978), and Willow City Farmers Elevator v. Thompson, 261 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1977), and cases cited therein. The factors which enter into our evaluation are expressed in those cases. We add the f......
  • Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Halvorson, 9905
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1981
    ...why his noncompliance with the rules should be overlooked and why his appeal should not be dismissed. See, Willow City Farmers Elevator v. Thompson, 261 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1977). Halvorson's motion to file an answer in the district court is denied; the motion to dismiss the appeal is ERICKSTAD......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT