Wilson v. Cowan
| Decision Date | 30 June 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 77-3369,77-3369 |
| Citation | 578 F.2d 166 |
| Parties | George Edward WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Henry E. COWAN, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Alton D. Priddy, Hardy, Logan & Hastings, Louisville, Ky., George Edward Wilson, Eddyville, Ky., for petitioner-appellant.
Robert F. Stephens, Atty. Gen. of Kentucky, James M. Ringo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, Ky., for respondent-appellee.
Before EDWARDS, LIVELY and KEITH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner-appellant George Edward Wilson appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus by a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. After a remand by this court, the District Judge conducted a hearing and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and again denied the writ. Since the record now before us shows that appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel, we reverse and remand for entry of a writ of habeas corpus unless Kentucky retries appellant within a reasonable period of time.
The District Judge's findings of fact which we accept as not clearly erroneous include the following:
This habeas corpus proceeding is before the Court as the result of a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner, George Edward Wilson, an inmate at the Kentucky State Penitentiary, Eddyville, Kentucky. Petitioner is currently serving a sentence of ten (10) years pursuant to a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court, entered on February 15, 1974, after a jury found him guilty of armed robbery.
The District Judge then noted that appellant had pursued postconviction remedies in the Kentucky state courts so as to exhaust his state remedies. The District Judge's findings continue:
On the morning of November 13, 1972, Robert H. Wilson 1 and Allen E. Benton, employees of the Roses Department Store, Algonquin Shopping Center, Louisville, Kentucky, were returning from the Algonquin Branch of the First National Bank with four bank deposit bags containing about $8,500. As they were approaching the front door of the department store, two black males approached and stopped them.
One of the men stuck a gun into Robert H. Wilson's stomach and made him surrender his bags of money. Robert H. Wilson testified that the course of the robbery took five to ten minutes and he was consciously being aware of what the robbers looked like. (At trial Robert H. Wilson positively identified the petitioner as the man who put the gun in his stomach and robbed him of the deposit bags of money.)
Subsequent to the armed robbery, the victims viewed hundreds of mug shots and picked out look-alikes but were unable to make positive identifications. On November 27, 1972, Robert H. Wilson viewed a lineup consisting of four persons, which included the petitioner. Wilson told police officers that he thought the petitioner was one of the armed robbers but that he could not make a positive identification. Approximately a month after the first lineup, Benton viewed a photograph of a lineup and told police that one of the subjects, petitioner, looked like one of the armed robbers. At a second lineup, petitioner was positively identified by both victims of the armed robbery. At trial, both victims positively identified petitioner in court as one of the persons who had robbed them at gun point.
We accept these findings of fact as being supported by the record of the state court trial and the federal habeas hearing and as not being clearly erroneous.
The District Judge then summarized appellant's habeas arguments:
This habeas corpus action brought by petitioner is based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and for his grounds the petitioner claims, to wit:
(1) Trial counsel failed to ask for a suppression hearing concerning the pre-trial identification by the two eyewitness victims of the armed robbery.
(2) Trial counsel failed to call alibi witnesses.
(3) Trial counsel failed to move for a bill of particulars.
(4) Trial counsel failed to move for a directed verdict.
(5) Trial counsel failed to put on any direct proof on behalf of petitioner.
The District Judge then analyzed each of these issues separately and concluded that no one of them offended the constitutional requirement of effective assistance of counsel. His analysis was based upon the standard of this Circuit, which is that effective assistance of counsel is that which is reasonably likely to render and does in fact render reasonably effective assistance under the particular facts and circumstances of the case. Beasley v. United States, 491 F.2d 687, 696 (6th Cir. 1974).
In each instance the District Judge found occasion to excuse the inaction of counsel now complained of. We believe, however, that under the facts of this case, counsel's failure to call an alibi witness who was ready and willing to testify, when coupled with arguably less egregious errors, did deprive appellant of effective assistance of counsel.
It is important to recognize the background facts against which these decisions were made.
The entire prosecution case consisted of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Glover
...a material defense. See, e.g., Bell v. Georgia, 554 F.2d 1360 (5th Cir.1977); Gomez v. Beto, 462 F.2d 596 (5th Cir.1972); Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F.2d 166 (6th Cir.1978); People v. Rodriguez, 73 Cal.App.3d 1023, 141 Cal.Rptr. 118 (1977), review denied, Jan. 5, 1978; Holland v. Commonwealth, 67......
-
Johnson v. State
...(1978); MacKenna v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960); cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877, 82 S.Ct. 121, 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961); Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F.2d 166 (6th Cir. 1978); United States ex rel. Healey v. Cannon, 553 F.2d 1052 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 874, 98 S.Ct. 221, 54 L.Ed.2d 153 (1......
-
Long v. Morrow
...to call alibi witnesses can be grounds for ineffectiveness. Matthews v. Abramaitys, 319 F.3d 780, 789 (6th Cir. 2003); Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F.2d 166, 168 (6th Cir. 1978). Such a claim especially warrants relief where defense counsel promises the jury an alibi witness and does not call such ......
-
Clinkscale v. Carter
...aside our "grave reservations concerning the reliability of eyewitness testimony," Blackburn, 828 F.2d at 1186 (citing Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F.2d 166, 168 (6th Cir.1978)), the accuracy of Williams's identification is highly suspect. As stated, Williams told a 911 operator just after the shoo......
-
It Adds Up: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the Cumulative Deficiency Doctrine
...1983); Dyer v. Crisp, 613 F.2d 275, 276 (10th Cir. 1980); United States v. Bosch, 584 F.2d 1113, 1122 (1st Cir. 1978).53. Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F.2d 166, 166-68 (6th Cir. 1978) (stressing the background facts of the case against which the attorney made his decisions).54. United States ex rel......