Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conserv.

Citation424 F.3d 437
Decision Date22 September 2005
Docket NumberNo. 03-1122.,03-1122.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America ex rel. Karen T. WILSON, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT; Cherokee County Soil & Water Conservation District; Richard Greene; William Timpson; Keith Orr; Raymond Williams; Dale Wiggins; Gerald Phillips; Allen Dehart; Lloyd Millsaps; Jerry Williams; Billy Brown; Lynn Cody; Bill Tipton; C.B. Newton; Eddie Wood; Graham County, Defendants — Appellees, and Graham County Board of County Commissioners; Cherokee County Board of County Commissioners; Cherie Greene; Ricky Stiles; Betty Jean Orr; Joyce Lane; Jimmy Orr; Eugene Morrow; Charles Lane; Charles Laney; George Postell; Lloyd Kissleburg; Ted Orr; Bernice Orr; John Doe; John Doe Corporations, and defendant; Government Entities 1-99, Defendants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
ORDER

WILKINSON.

This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 2444, 162 L.Ed.2d 390 (2005). In accordance with that decision, we in turn remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss it as time-barred under North Carolina's three-year statute of limitations for wrongful discharge. See N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1-52(5) (2003); Renegar v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 145 N.C.App. 78, 549 S.E.2d 227, 229 (2001).

Entered at the direction of Judge Wilkinson, with the concurrence of Judge Michael and Judge Duncan.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • U.S. ex rel. Smith v. Yale University
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • February 14, 2006
    ...and consequently, was the limitations period applied by the Fourth Circuit on remand. See United States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham Cty. Soil & Water Conserv. Dist., 424 F.3d 437 (4th Cir.2005). Connecticut also recognizes a common law tort claim for wrongful discharge "where the discharge con......
  • GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL, WATER v. US ex rel. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • November 30, 2009
    ...545 U.S. 409, 125 S.Ct. 2444, 162 L.Ed.2d 390 (2005), the Court of Appeals ordered that that claim be dismissed as time barred. 424 F.3d 437 (C.A.4 2005). On remand, the District Court subsequently dismissed Wilson's qui tam action for lack of jurisdiction. App. to Pet. for Cert. 95a-105a. ......
  • Graham Cnty. Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. United States ex rel. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 30, 2010
    ...545 U.S. 409, 125 S.Ct. 2444, 162 L.Ed.2d 390 (2005), the Court of Appeals ordered that that claim be dismissed as time barred. 424 F.3d 437 (C.A.4 2005). On remand, the District Court subsequently dismissed Wilson's qui tam action for lack of jurisdiction. App. to Pet. for Cert. 95a–105a. ......
  • Yashenko v. Harrah's Nc Casino Co., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • April 27, 2006
    ...on the state law wrongful discharge claim will not expire until July 2006. See United States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist., 424 F.3d 437, 437 (4th Cir.2005). Accordingly, we see no basis for finding an abuse of discretion in the district court's decision di......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT