Wilson v. Salamanca
Decision Date | 01 October 1878 |
Citation | 99 U.S. 499,25 L.Ed. 330 |
Parties | WILSON v. SALAMANCA |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
'No. 149.] Interest ten per cent per annum. [$500.
'Know all men by these presents, that the municipal township of Salamanca, in the county of Cherokee and State of Kansas, acknowledges itself indebted and firmly bound to the Memphis, Carthage, and Northwestern Railroad Company, or bearer, in the sum of $500, which sum the said township of Salamanca, for value received, hereby promises to pay said company, or bearer, at the National Park Bank in the city of New York and State of New York, twenty years after date, with interest thereon from the date hereof, at the rate of ten per centum per annum, payable annually on the first day of September of each year, on the presentation and delivery at said National Park Bank, in said city of New York, State of New York, of the coupons of interest hereto attached.
'This bond is issued pursuant to an order of the proper officers of said township made by authority of an act of the legislature of the State of Kansas, entitled 'An Act to authorize counties, incorporated cities, and municipal townships to issue bonds for the purpose of building bridges, aiding in the construction of railroads, water-power, or other works of internal improvement, and providing for the registration of said bonds, the registration of other bonds, and the repealing of all laws in conflict therewith,' approved March 2, 1872, and ordered by the qualified electors of said township at an election duly held.
'In testimony whereof, the said township of Salamanca has executed this bond by the township trustee of said township, under the order of the proper officers of said township, signing his name hereto, and by the township clerk of said township, under like order, attesting the same, and affixing hereto his name.
'Done this second day of September, A.D. 1872.
'JOHN RALEY,
'Township Trustee of Salamanca Township, Cherokee County, Kansas.
'Attested by W. O. BRANNIN,
'Township Clerk of Salamanca Township, Cherokee County, Kansas.'
'I, A. Thoman, auditor of the State of Kansas, do hereby certify that this bond has been regularly and legally issued, that the signatures thereto are genuine, and that such bond has been duly registered in my office, in accordance with an act of the legislature entitled an act to authorize counties, incorporated cities, and municipal townships to issue bonds for the purpose of building bridges, aiding in the construction of railroads or other works of internal improvement, and providing for the registration of such bonds, the registration of other bonds, and the repealing of all laws in conflict therewith. Approved March 2, 1872.
'Witness my hand and official seal, this eleventh day of October, 1872.
'A. THOMAN,
[SEAL. 'Auditor of State.'-
The coupons are in the following form:——
'The township of Salamanca, Cherokee County, Kansas, promises to pay the sum of fifty dollars on the first day of September, A.D. 1873, being interest on bond No. 149, for $500, payable at the National Park Bank in the city and State of New York.
'W. O. BRANNIN,
'Township Clerk of Salamanca Township, Cherokee County, Kansas.'
The statute of Kansas of Feb. 25, 1870 (Laws of Kansas, 1870, 189), to enable municipal townships to subscribe for stock in any railroad, provides that the amount of bonds voted by any township shall not be above such an amount as will require a levy of more than one per cent per annum on the taxable property of such township, to pay the yearly interest on the amount of bonds issued.
The material provisions of the statute of March 2, 1872 (Laws of Kansas, 1872, 110), which is mentioned in the bonds and certificate of the auditor, are as follows:——
' . ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
I IS Ljo State v. County Court Op Wirt County.
...Id., 680; 15 Wall. 356; 92 U. S. 484, 489; 14 Ohio St. 260; 92 U. S. 494; 92 IT. S. 638; 92 U. S. 642; 94 U. S. 104; Id., 202; Id., 682; 99 U. S. 499; 102 U. S. 81; 102 U S. 412; Id., 278; 103 U. S. 648; 133 U. S. 198; 5 Wall. 194; 96 U. S. 675; 13 Wall. 297; 104 U. S. 579; 5 Wall. 772; 113......
-
Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.
... ... 801, 24 L.Ed. 322; Nugent v. Supervisors, 19 ... Wall. 249, 22 L.Ed. 83; County of Scotland v ... Thomas, 94 U.S. 682, 24 L.Ed. 219; Wilson v ... Salamanca, 99 U.S. 499, 25 L.Ed. 330; Empire v ... Darlington, 101 U.S. 87, 25 L.Ed. 878; Menasha v ... Hazard, 102 U.S. 81, 26 ... ...
-
Adams v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Co.
...v. Alsbrook, 146 U.S. 279. See also analogous questions, Scolland v. Thomas, 94 U.S, 682; Schuyler Co. v. Thomas, 98 U.S. 169; Wilson v. Salamanco, 99 U.S. 499; Empire v. Darlington, 101 U.S. 87; Menasha Hazard, 102 U.S. 81; New Buffalo v. Cambria Iron Co., 105 U.S. 73; Citizens' Street Rai......
-
Livingston County v. First National Bank of Portsmouth
...This court reversed the judgment below, which had been in favor of the plaintiff, and remanded the case for a new trial. In Wilson v. Salamanca, 99 U. S. 499, at October term, 1878, the suit was against the township of Salamanca, in Cherokee county, Kan., to recover the amount of coupons de......