Wilson v. Salamanca

Decision Date01 October 1878
Citation99 U.S. 499,25 L.Ed. 330
PartiesWILSON v. SALAMANCA
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

'No. 149.] Interest ten per cent per annum. [$500.

'Know all men by these presents, that the municipal township of Salamanca, in the county of Cherokee and State of Kansas, acknowledges itself indebted and firmly bound to the Memphis, Carthage, and Northwestern Railroad Company, or bearer, in the sum of $500, which sum the said township of Salamanca, for value received, hereby promises to pay said company, or bearer, at the National Park Bank in the city of New York and State of New York, twenty years after date, with interest thereon from the date hereof, at the rate of ten per centum per annum, payable annually on the first day of September of each year, on the presentation and delivery at said National Park Bank, in said city of New York, State of New York, of the coupons of interest hereto attached.

'This bond is issued pursuant to an order of the proper officers of said township made by authority of an act of the legislature of the State of Kansas, entitled 'An Act to authorize counties, incorporated cities, and municipal townships to issue bonds for the purpose of building bridges, aiding in the construction of railroads, water-power, or other works of internal improvement, and providing for the registration of said bonds, the registration of other bonds, and the repealing of all laws in conflict therewith,' approved March 2, 1872, and ordered by the qualified electors of said township at an election duly held.

'In testimony whereof, the said township of Salamanca has executed this bond by the township trustee of said township, under the order of the proper officers of said township, signing his name hereto, and by the township clerk of said township, under like order, attesting the same, and affixing hereto his name.

'Done this second day of September, A.D. 1872.

'JOHN RALEY,

'Township Trustee of Salamanca Township, Cherokee County, Kansas.

'Attested by W. O. BRANNIN,

'Township Clerk of Salamanca Township, Cherokee County, Kansas.'

'I, A. Thoman, auditor of the State of Kansas, do hereby certify that this bond has been regularly and legally issued, that the signatures thereto are genuine, and that such bond has been duly registered in my office, in accordance with an act of the legislature entitled an act to authorize counties, incorporated cities, and municipal townships to issue bonds for the purpose of building bridges, aiding in the construction of railroads or other works of internal improvement, and providing for the registration of such bonds, the registration of other bonds, and the repealing of all laws in conflict therewith. Approved March 2, 1872.

'Witness my hand and official seal, this eleventh day of October, 1872.

'A. THOMAN,

[SEAL. 'Auditor of State.'-

The coupons are in the following form:——

'$50.] COLUMBUS. [$50.

'The township of Salamanca, Cherokee County, Kansas, promises to pay the sum of fifty dollars on the first day of September, A.D. 1873, being interest on bond No. 149, for $500, payable at the National Park Bank in the city and State of New York.

'W. O. BRANNIN,

'Township Clerk of Salamanca Township, Cherokee County, Kansas.'

The statute of Kansas of Feb. 25, 1870 (Laws of Kansas, 1870, 189), to enable municipal townships to subscribe for stock in any railroad, provides that the amount of bonds voted by any township shall not be above such an amount as will require a levy of more than one per cent per annum on the taxable property of such township, to pay the yearly interest on the amount of bonds issued.

The material provisions of the statute of March 2, 1872 (Laws of Kansas, 1872, 110), which is mentioned in the bonds and certificate of the auditor, are as follows:——

'SECT. 1. That the board of county commissioners of any county, the mayor and common council of any incorporated city, and the trustee, clerk, and treasurer of any municipal township in this State, are hereby empowered to issue the bonds of such county, city, or township, in any sum necessary, not greater than ten per cent, inclusive of all other bonded indebtedness of the taxable property of such county, city, or township, for the purpose of building bridges, free or otherwise, or to aid in the construction of railroads or water power, by donation thereto, or the taking of stock therein, or for other works of internal improvement. . . . Provided further, that under a proposal for aid to any railroad, any township having less than $200,000 taxable property may issue in addition to the ten per cent authorized in this section, ten per centum of an amount equal to the number of miles of railroad (agreed under such proposal to be constructed within such township) multiplied by six thousand. And provided further, that the limit prescribed in this section shall not apply and be considered to restrict or prevent the issuing of any bonds heretofore voted, or vote now pending, in any county or township in this State, and which bonds may not have yet been issued; but that the limit herein shall only be considered as applying only to the issuing of bonds to be hereafter voted under...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • I IS Ljo State v. County Court Op Wirt County.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1893
    ...Id., 680; 15 Wall. 356; 92 U. S. 484, 489; 14 Ohio St. 260; 92 U. S. 494; 92 IT. S. 638; 92 U. S. 642; 94 U. S. 104; Id., 202; Id., 682; 99 U. S. 499; 102 U. S. 81; 102 U S. 412; Id., 278; 103 U. S. 648; 133 U. S. 198; 5 Wall. 194; 96 U. S. 675; 13 Wall. 297; 104 U. S. 579; 5 Wall. 772; 113......
  • Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 17, 1906
    ... ... 801, 24 L.Ed. 322; Nugent v. Supervisors, 19 ... Wall. 249, 22 L.Ed. 83; County of Scotland v ... Thomas, 94 U.S. 682, 24 L.Ed. 219; Wilson v ... Salamanca, 99 U.S. 499, 25 L.Ed. 330; Empire v ... Darlington, 101 U.S. 87, 25 L.Ed. 878; Menasha v ... Hazard, 102 U.S. 81, 26 ... ...
  • Adams v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1898
    ...v. Alsbrook, 146 U.S. 279. See also analogous questions, Scolland v. Thomas, 94 U.S, 682; Schuyler Co. v. Thomas, 98 U.S. 169; Wilson v. Salamanco, 99 U.S. 499; Empire v. Darlington, 101 U.S. 87; Menasha Hazard, 102 U.S. 81; New Buffalo v. Cambria Iron Co., 105 U.S. 73; Citizens' Street Rai......
  • Livingston County v. First National Bank of Portsmouth
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • October 29, 1888
    ...This court reversed the judgment below, which had been in favor of the plaintiff, and remanded the case for a new trial. In Wilson v. Salamanca, 99 U. S. 499, at October term, 1878, the suit was against the township of Salamanca, in Cherokee county, Kan., to recover the amount of coupons de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT