Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.
| Decision Date | 22 September 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. S52368.,S52368. |
| Parties | WILSON v. SMURFIT NEWSPRINT CORP. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review dismissed.
Petitioner on review's letter filed July 19, 2005, is construed to be a motion to dismiss cross-appellant's petition for review. The motion is granted and the petition for review is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Ctr., Inc.
...the standard does "not necessarily imply anything blamable, or any malice or wrong toward the other party." Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp. , 197 Or. App. 648, 660, 107 P.3d 61, rev. den. , 339 Or. 407, 122 P.3d 65 (2005) (citation omitted). For example, in this case, there is no indicati......
-
State v. Nicholson, A158526
...in not knowing, when it should have known, that a representation made by [the defendant] was not true”); cf. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp. , 197 Or.App. 648, 660–66, 107 P.3d 61, rev. dismissed, 339 Or. 407, 122 P.3d 65 (2005) (canvassing precedents addressing meaning of “willful” for p......
-
Columbia Gorge Com'n v. Hood River County, 050051CC.
...granted summary judgment, because it failed to draw all reasonable inferences in their favor. ORCP 47 C; see Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp., 197 Or.App. 648, 650, 107 P.3d 61, rev. dismissed, 339 Or. 407, 122 P.3d 65 (2005) ("summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence in the record ......
-
L.H. Morris Elec. v. Hyundai Semiconuctor
...is payable on "[a]ll moneys" after they become due, "applies with full force to prejudgment interest[.]" Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp., 197 Or.App. 648, 673, 107 P.3d 61, rev dismissed, 339 Or. 407, 122 P.3d 65 (2005). But there is, as we have explained, a limitation on that general "In......
Request a trial to view additional results