Winder v. Executive Cleaning Servs., LLC
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | MARK C. DILLON |
| Citation | Winder v. Executive Cleaning Servs., LLC, 91 A.D.3d 865, 936 N.Y.S.2d 687, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012) |
| Decision Date | 24 January 2012 |
| Parties | Ann WINDER, et al., respondents, v. EXECUTIVE CLEANING SERVICES, LLC, appellant, et al., defendants. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Litchfield Cavo LLP, New York, N.Y. (John V. Barbieri and Russell J. McBrearty of counsel), for appellant.
Schwartz Goldstone & Campisi, LLP (Annette G. Hasapidis, South Salem, N.Y., of counsel), for respondents.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., PLUMMER E. LOTT, SHERI S. ROMAN, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Executive Cleaning Services, LLC, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated October 20, 2010, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.
On November 14, 2005, the plaintiff AnnWinder (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly was injured while walking into the cafeteria located in the office building where she worked. Only after the injured plaintiff fell to the floor and was sitting on a carpet runner near the entrance to the cafeteria, did she notice that part of the runner was folded up.
To impose liability upon a defendant for a plaintiff's injuries, there must be evidence showing the existence of a dangerous or defective condition, and that the defendant either created the condition or had actual or constructive notice of it and failed to remedy it within a reasonable time ( see Drago v. DeLuccio, 79 A.D.3d 966, 913 N.Y.S.2d 747; Penn v. Fleet Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107; Christopher v. New York City Tr. Auth., 300 A.D.2d 336, 752 N.Y.S.2d 76). Here, the defendant Executive Cleaning Services, LLC (hereinafter the appellant), which was responsible for cleaning the accident site, sustained its initial burden of establishing its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the injured plaintiff's deposition testimony, which revealed that she did not know what caused her to trip as she entered the cafeteria of her office building ( see Drago v. DeLuccio, 79 A.D.3d 966, 913 N.Y.S.2d 747; Penn v. Fleet Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107). The injured plaintiff admitted at her deposition that she did...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Giannotti v. Hudson Valley Fed. Credit Union
...and that it was only after she fell that she observed a part of the rug to be in a folded condition (see Winder v. Executive Cleaning Services, LLC, 91 A.D.3d 865, 865, 936 N.Y.S.2d 687 ; Drago v. DeLuccio, 79 A.D.3d 966, 966–967, 913 N.Y.S.2d 747 ; Penn v. Fleet Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 584, 7......
-
Davis v. Sutton
...684, 974 N.Y.S.2d 568 ; Kudrina v. 82–04 Lefferts Tenants Corp., 110 A.D.3d at 964, 973 N.Y.S.2d 364 ; Winder v. Executive Cleaning Servs., LLC, 91 A.D.3d 865, 936 N.Y.S.2d 687 ; Arzola v. Boston Props., Ltd. Partnership, 63 A.D.3d 655, 656, 880 N.Y.S.2d 352 ). Whether a dangerous or defect......
-
Vasquez v. United States
...or had actual or constructive notice of it and failed to remedy it within a reasonable time." See Winder v. Exec. Cleaning Servs., LLC, 936 N.Y.S.2d 687, 687 (2d Dep't 2012); see also Feis v. United States, 394 F. App'x 797, 798 (2d Cir. 2010) ("To make out a prima facie case of negligence ......
-
Red v. Lam Platt St. Hotel
... ... reasonable time.” Winder v. Exec. Cleaning Servs., ... LLC, 936 N.Y.S.2d 687, 688 (2d Dep't ... ...