Windham v. State

Citation520 So.2d 123
Decision Date12 November 1987
Docket NumberNo. 57229,57229
PartiesOtis Lee WINDHAM v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi

Franklin M. Coleman, Meridian, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ANDERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ.

HAWKINS, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

Otis Lee Windham appeals from his conviction in the circuit court of Kemper County of the murder of Albert Thurston Calvert and sentence to life imprisonment. Because the State was granted an instruction that the "deliberate design" essential to murder could be formed "at the very moment" of the fatal beating, and was in irreconcilable conflict with the manslaughter instructions, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Calvert, 79, and Mrs. Betty Calvert, 78, had been married 51 years. Since 1938, Calvert had owned and run a small grocery store in the Zion Community of Kemper County. Calvert had no right arm; it had been cut off at the shoulder. The Calverts lived in a house situated up a little hill across the road from the old, wooden, tin-roofed store.

Two gas pumps stood side-by-side immediately in front of the store. Calvert kept two guns on the premises. A .22 caliber rifle leaned against the back of the entrance door. A small pistol resided in a holster hanging underneath the cash register. The guns were visible to all who came in the store and their presence seems to have been common knowledge.

On June 26, 1985, around 6:00 or 6:30 p.m. Otis Lee Windham, 21, pulled into Calvert's Grocery to buy gas. His car windows were down. A silver hammer was inside Windham's car.

It is undisputed that Calvert and Windham discussed a $15 or $20 debt he owed to Calvert's Grocery. Wanda Hampton, while fishing in Mr. Calvert's pond with relatives, heard Mrs. Calvert say, "If you don't leave him alone, I'll call the sheriff." Mrs. Calvert struck Windham in the face. Windham struck her on the head. (She received six stitches.) Windham did something to Mr. Calvert to cause Mr. Calvert to die. Mrs. Calvert did not see what Windham did. Windham immediately departed in his car and eventually drove to the jail to tell the deputy sheriff what happened. At that point, he learned that Calvert had died. He then made the following statement:

Me and Mr. Calvert was arguing about a bill I owed him and I started pumping gas and Mrs. Calvert came from the house, she hit me in the mouth with her fist. That is when everything turned alose [sic]. I must have went to the car and got my hammer and then hit Mrs. Calvert. Then I grabbed her husband. I pushed him and got into my car and left.... Mr. Calvert never hit me but he started back in the store and that's when I grabbed him and throwed him. He was going from me and I caught him at the door.

Windham's trial testimony was that, as he started pumping gas, he was talking to Mr. Calvert when he heard somebody say something and he went to turn around and somebody hit him in the mouth. He reflexively hit the person with the gas nozzle, then turned around and looked, and saw that it was Mrs. Calvert. Then he turned around and looked at Mr. Calvert, and Mr. Calvert had started back inside the store. Windham caught him by his shirt and pulled him back around to the front of the car. He threw Mr. Calvert hard enough so he could get to his car and get away. Windham stopped Mr. Calvert from running to the store because he knew Mr. Calvert had two guns in there. Windham concluded by saying he was really scared because he knew Mr. Calvert was upset about his wife being hurt.

According to Mrs. Calvert, she tried to pry Windham's grip loose from her husband's arm. When Windham refused to release Mr. Calvert, she hit him on the cheekbone. Windham reached in his car and got a shiny hammer and hit her head hard enough to knock her out. As she regained consciousness, she saw her husband's body fall out in front of her "limber as a dishrag." She assumed that Windham hit Mr. Calvert on the head with the hammer but admitted that she did not see the act.

According to the state medical examiner, there were at least two distinct blows to the back of Calvert's head. The pathologist stated in his autopsy report that the cause of death was blunt, traumatic head injuries from a beating. He arrived at beating as the cause of the injuries because of the two distinct blows to the head. The injuries were "more than could be accounted for by simply falling and hitting his head and then another bounce."

It is Windham's contention that Mr. Calvert did not simply fall down, but that he was violently thrown to the ground and that, because Calvert was a big man (6'2"), he hit hard. The pathologist referred to a blunt instrument having struck the head, but considered concrete or asphalt pavement to be blunt instruments capable of causing blunt trauma. There is no eyewitness testimony to contradict Windham's account that he violently threw Mr. Calvert to the ground and Mr. Calvert's head bounced and hit a second time.

LAW

Under the unusual facts of this case, there were four possible statutory scenarios which the jury could have considered.

Miss.Code Ann. § 97-3-19(1)(a) (Supp.1986) defines murder:

§ 97-3-19. Homicide; murder defined; capital murder.

(1) The killing of a human being without the authority of law by any means or in any manner shall be murder in the following cases:

(a) When done with deliberate design to effect the death of the person killed, or of any human being;

Miss.Code Ann. § 97-3-15 (Supp.1986) lists eight different cases in which the killing of a human being is justifiable. One is:

§ 97-3-15. Homicide; justifiable homicide.

(1)(f) When committed in the lawful defense of one's own person or any other human being, where there shall be reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great personal injury, and there shall be imminent danger of such design being accomplished.

Under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-3-17 (Supp.1986), killing a human being is excusable:

§ 97-3-17. Homicide--excusable homicide.

The killing of any human being by the act, procurement, or omission of another shall be excusable:

* * *

* * *

(b) When committed by accident and misfortune, in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation;

(c) When committed upon any sudden combat, without undue advantage being taken, and without any dangerous weapon being used, and not done in a cruel or unusual manner.

Miss.Code Ann. § 97-3-35 (Supp.1986) defines one form of manslaughter as:

§ 97-3-35. Homicide--killing without malice in the heat of passion.

The killing of a human being without malice, in the heat of passion, but in a cruel or unusual manner, or by the use of a dangerous weapon, without authority of law, and not in necessary self-defense, shall be manslaughter.

There was no request by either the State or Windham to instruct the jury on whether this was an excusable homicide under Miss.Code Ann. § 97-3-17, but such an instruction may very well be proper upon retrial.

There were a number of instructions given, correctly defining murder and manslaughter, and when a homicide was justifiable on the ground of lawful self-defense. Instruction S-1 given over the objection of Windham necessitates reversal:

The Court instructs the Jury that deliberate design, mentioned in the indictment, does not have to exist in the mind of the slayer for any given length of time; and if at the very moment of the fatal beating, the State has convinced you from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant, Otis Lee Windham, on the 26th day of June, 1985, in Kemper County, Mississippi, beat with a hammer with the deliberate design to take the life of Albert Thurston Calvert, and not in necessary self-defense, real or apparent, then it was as truly deliberate design and the act was as truly murder as if the deliberate design had existed in the mind of the defendant for minutes, hours, days, weeks or even years. Then you shall find the Defendant guilty of Murder and the form of your verdict shall be as follows: [Emphasis added]

"We, the jury, find the Defendant guilty of Murder."

Write your verdict on a separate sheet of clean paper.

In conjunction with Instruction S-1, the jury was given Instruction S-5:

The Court instructs the Jury that Manslaughter is the wilful, felonious killing of a human being, without malice in the heat of passion, by the use of a dangerous weapon, without authority of law and not in necessary self-defense. [Emphasis added]

If you find from the evidence in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that on or about the 26th day of June, 1985, in Kemper County, Mississippi:

1. The deceased, Albert Thurston Calvert, was a living person,

and,

2. He died as a result of being struck with a hammer on the 26th day of June, 1985.

3. While the Defendant, Otis Lee Windham, and the deceased, Albert Thurston Calvert, were arguing and Otis Lee Windham struck Albert Thurston

Calvert with a hammer, in heat of passion.

4. Not in necessary self-defense and without authority of law;

Then you shall find the Defendant, Otis Lee Windham, guilty of Manslaughter and the form of your verdict may be as follows:

"We, the Jury, find the Defendant guilty of Manslaughter."

Write your verdict on a separate sheet of clean paper. 1

By statute murder requires a "deliberate design to effect the death of the person killed." As defined by dictionaries the word "deliberate" always indicates full awareness of what one is doing, and generally implies careful and unhurried consideration of the consequences. "Design" means to calculate, plan, contemplate. These are general and accepted meanings of these words.

While it is no doubt true that a deliberate design to kill a person may be formed very quickly, and perhaps only moments before the act of consummating the intent, it is a contradiction in terms to state...

To continue reading

Request your trial
61 cases
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • November 17, 2020
    ...v. State , 676 So. 2d 244, 246 (Miss. 1996) (" ‘[W]ilful’ means nothing more than doing an act intentionally.").10 See Windham v. State , 520 So. 2d 123, 127 (Miss. 1987) ("A person may form an intent to kill from a sudden passion induced by insult, provocation or injury from another. In th......
  • Carr v. State, 90-DP-01106
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 2, 1995
    ...the fatal act, this is sufficient deliberate design to constitute the offense of capital murder or murder. Relying on Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123 (Miss.1987), Carr asserts the trial court erred in granting this instruction. In Windham, the trial court erroneously instructed the jury tha......
  • Holland v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 11, 1991
    ...out manslaughter[ ] and is in hopeless conflict with [a] manslaughter instruction." Appellant's Brief at 40-43 (quoting Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123, 126 (Miss.1987)). Because the trial judge properly denied the manslaughter instruction, this Court affirms on the 7. Conviction Affirmed B......
  • Windham v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 20, 1992
    ...and the trial judge sentenced him to life imprisonment. On appeal, this Court reversed and remanded for a new trial. See Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123 (Miss.1988). On remand, another jury found Windham guilty of murder, and Judge Robert W. Bailey sentenced him to life imprisonment. Windha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT