Winkler v. Winkler

Citation225 N.Y.S.2d 763,11 N.Y.2d 693
Parties, 180 N.E.2d 915 Marie F. WINKLER, Appellant, v. Frederick E. WINKLER, Respondent.
Decision Date25 January 1962
CourtNew York Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 13 A.D.2d 924, 216 N.Y.S.2d 307.

A wife brought a separation action on ground of abandonment and sought to recover alimony at the rate of $40,000 per annum.

The Supreme Court, Special and Trial Term, New York County, Isidor Wasservogel, Special Referee, 25 Misc.2d 938, 207 N.Y.S.2d 940, rendered a separation decree and awarded the wife alimony in an allegedly inadequate amount amount, and the wife appealed.

The Appellate Division, 13 A.D.2d 924, 216 N.Y.S.2d 307, affirmed the judgment and held that the amount awarded as support for the wife was adequate.

The wife appealed to the Court of appeals.

George C. Levin, New York City (Leonard G. Bisco, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

All concur except DESMOND, C. J., taking no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Kover v. Kover
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 1972
    ...Hearst, 3 N.Y.2d 967, 169 N.Y.S.2d 36, 146 N.E.2d 792, affg. 3 A.D.2d 706, 159 N.Y.S.2d 753, Supra; see, also, Winkler v. Winkler, 11 N.Y.2d 693, 225 N.Y.S.2d 763, 180 N.E.2d 915); the age and health of the parties and, to a limited extent, their conduct. (See Phillips v. Phillips, 1 A.D.2d......
  • O'Brien v. O'Brien
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 11, 1985
    ...(see Contrubis v. Contrubis, 46 A.D.2d 615, 359 N.Y.S.2d 785; Winkler v. Winkler, 13 A.D.2d 924, 216 N.Y.S.2d 307, affd. 11 N.Y.2d 693, 225 N.Y.S.2d 763, 180 N.E.2d 915; Hunter v. Hunter, 10 A.D.2d 291, 295, 198 N.Y.S.2d 1008; Millner v. Millner, 60 Misc.2d 122, 124-125, 301 N.Y.S.2d Obviou......
  • Conner v. Conner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 31, 1983
    ...v. Brownstein, supra; Winkler v. Winkler, 25 Misc.2d 938, 207 N.Y.S.2d 940, affd. 13 A.D.2d 924, 216 N.Y.S.2d 307, affd. 11 N.Y.2d 693, 225 N.Y.S.2d 763, 180 N.E.2d 915; Doyle v. Doyle, 5 Misc.2d 4, 158 N.Y.S.2d 909). Of particular concern to the drafters of the Equitable Distribution Law w......
  • McMains v. McMains
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 1965
    ...646, affd. 2 N.Y.2d 742, 157 N.Y.S.2d 378, 138 N.E.2d 738; Winkler v. Winkler, 13 A.D.2d 924, 216 N.Y.S.2d 307, affd. 11 N.Y.2d 693, 225 N.Y.S.2d 763, 180 N.E.2d 915). A wife is not entitled to a share of her husband's income as such nor is there a right to escalation as the husband prosper......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT