Winnebago County v. Industrial Commission

Decision Date19 January 1968
Docket NumberNo. 40820,40820
PartiesThe COUNTY OF WINNEBAGO, Appellant, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION. (Leona V. Goldy et al., Appellees.)
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

John E. Sype, Sp. Asst. State's Atty., Rockford, for appellant.

Smith, Penniman, McGreevy & Donohue, Rockford, for appellees.

WARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from the order of the circuit court of Winnebago County affirming the award of compensation to claimants, the widow and minor child of Bill D. Goldy, for his death while serving as a deputy sheriff. Compensation had been awarded by the arbitrator against Winnebago County and the Industrial Commission upheld the award. On Certiorari the circuit court, as stated, confirmed the award.

The controlling circumstances are not controverted. Goldy was a full-time deputy sheriff, regularly appointed by the sheriff of Winnebago County. Pursuant to statute (Ill.Rev.Stat.1965, chap. 125, pars. 7, 8, 9) he had given an indemnifying bond and had taken and subscribed the same oath as the one administered to a sheriff, which was filed in the office of the county clerk.

On April 15, 1965, Bill D. Goldy, while in the normal course of duties, was dispatched, with another deputy, to serve a mittimus on one Hinkle. Hinkle eluded Goldy and the other deputy at his place of employment and the deputies proceeded to his home. There Hinkle, upon seeing the deputies and the two police officers, who had been sent to assist them, locked himself in his house. Deputy Goldy forced the door lock of the house by pushing his shoulder against the door and after a minor scuffle Hinkle was placed under arrest. Hinkle was then take to the deputies' squad car by Goldy and ordered to get into the back seat. As Goldy opened the rear door of the squad car, he suffered a heart attack from which he died.

The appellant, County of Winnebago, has not elected to come under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act. Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 48, pars. 138.1 through 138.28.

Several questions are presented here but the first requiring resolution is whether it is correctly contended that Goldy was an official of the appellant county and not an employee within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 48, par. 138.1(b)), and therefore not covered by the Act.

The Workmen's Compensation Act defines the term 'employee' as: 'Every person in the service of the State, including all persons in the service of the University of Illinois, county, city, town, township, incorporated village or school district, body politic, or municipal corporation therein, under appointment or contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, except any official of the State or of any county, city, town, township, incorporated village, school district, body politic or municipal corporation therein and except any duly appointed member of the fire department or police department in any city whose population exceeds 200,000 according to the last Federal or State census, and except any member of a fire insurance patrol maintained by a board of underwriters in this State.' Ill.Rev.Stat.(1967), chap. 48, par. 138.1(b).

Deputy sheriffs are recognized in section 9 of article X of the Illinois constitution, S.H.A.: 'The number of the deputies and assistants of such officers (including sheriffs) shall be determined by rule of the circuit court, to be entered of record, and their compensation shall be determined by the county board.'

Our statutes specifically provide for the appointment, the powers, and the duties of deputy sheriffs. Section 7 of the Act relating to sheriffs and deputies (Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 125, par. 7) provides that a sheriff may appoint one or more deputies not exceeding the number allowed by rule of court and may take a bond from him for his indemnity. The deputy's appointment must be in writing and signed by the sheriff, and each deputy shall take and subscribe the same oath or affirmation as required of the sheriff before entering upon his duties of office. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 125, pars. 8 and 9.) Section 12 of the same act authorizes a deputy sheriff to perform any and all duties of the sheriff and provides that the acts of the deputy are the acts of the sheriff. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 125, par. 12.) Also, the sheriff is liable for any neglect or omission of the duties of office occasioned by a deputy as he would be for his own personal neglect or omission. Ill.Rev.Stat.1967, chap. 125, par. 13.

Section 24 of article V of the Illinois constitution defines an office as 'a public position created by the constitution or law, continuing during the pleasure of the appointing power, or for a fixed time, with a successor elected or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Chelan County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Chelan County
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1986
    ... ... Niobrara Cy., 557 P.2d 735, 740 (Wyo.1976); Winnebago Cy. v. Industrial Comm'n, 39 Ill.2d 260, 234 N.E.2d 781 (1968); Hensley v. Holder, 228 Ark. 401, ... a vacancy occurs, the sheriff cannot appoint any person, but must ask the civil service commission for the names of eligible appointees. RCW 41.14.130 ...         We conclude that given ... ...
  • Cook County v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1973
    ... ... The office of sheriff was created by the 1870 constitution (Ill.Const. (1870), art. X, sec. 8), and in County of Winnebago v. Industrial Com. (1968), 39 Ill.2d 260, 234 N.E.2d 781, a deputy sheriff was held to be an official of the county since at common law the sheriff and his deputy [55 Ill.2d 543] were considered as one and the same person. In a series of cases dealing with the question of whether a particular ... ...
  • City of Rockford v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • January 27, 1978
    ... ... The respondent took an appeal by certiorari to the circuit court of Winnebago County, which ultimately confirmed the decision of the Commission, and the respondent filed a notice of appeal to this court under Rule 302(a) (58 ... ...
  • Kron v. Kucharski
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 26, 1975
    ... ... KRON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, ... Edmund J. KUCHARSKI, County Treasurer and Ex Officio County ... Collector of Cook County, Illinois ... While it was held in City of Winnebago v. The Industrial Commission (1968), 39 Ill.2d 260, 234 N.E.2d 781, that, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT