Winnipissiogee Paper Co. v. Marsh
Decision Date | 19 July 1888 |
Citation | 15 A. 19,64 N.H. 531 |
Parties | WINNIPISSIOGEE PAPER CO. v. MARSH. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Appeal from probate court, Merrimack county.
Appeals from the disallowance of claims against the estate of Sylvester Marsh, deceased, by the commissioner of insolvency.
Daniel Barnard, for plaintiffBingham & Mitchell, for defendant.
The plaintiffs, who are the owners of a tract of land in Crawford's Purchase, claim to recover of the estate of Sylvester Marsh, a former owner and the grantor, with covenants of warranty of the plaintiffs' grantor, expenses incurred in a proceeding instituted by them to annul a tax deed of Crawford's Purchase and Chandler's Purchase, given upon a sale for taxes assessed against Marsh previous to the conveyance by him to the grantor of the plaintiffs.It appears that the suit to set aside the tax deed was instituted without notice to Marsh, and that neither he, in his life-time, nor his representative since his decease, was a party, or was notified to become a party to it, and that the suit was settled by agreement of the parties by a decree that the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Quick v. Walker
...15 Iowa 67; Mercantile Trust Co. v. South Park Residence Co., 94 Ky. 271, 22 S.W. 314; Crisfield v. Storr, 36 Md. 129; Winnipiseogee Paper Co. v. Marsh, 64 N.H. 531; Finton v. Egelston, 61 Hun 246, 16 N.Y.S. Fulweiler v. Baugher, 15 S. & R. (Pa.) 55; Harding v. Larkin, 41 Ill. 413.] As was ......
-
Eaton v. Clarke
...apparent cloud upon the title is not enough. Its validity must be shown to establish a liability of the warrantor. Winnipiseogee Paper Co. v. Marsh, 64 N. H. 531, 15 Atl. 19. In the present instance the adverse claim was held to be unfounded, unless it should be made to appear that it was n......
- Norris v Norris