Winston v. Moseley

Decision Date31 March 1864
Citation35 Mo. 146
PartiesTHOMAS M. WINSTON v. WILLIAM S. MOSELEY, Auditor of Public Accounts.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Petition for Mandamus.

E. B. Ewing, for petitioner.

Glover & Shepley, and Broadhead & Sharp, for respondent.

BATES, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a petition for a mandamus. Winston was, prior to December, 1863, Commissioner of the permanent seat of Government. In December, 1863, the General Assembly elected another person commissioner, who received a commission as such. Winston claims that he is still lawfully in office, and presented to the auditor an account for a quarter's salary, which the auditor refused to allow. Winston asks of this court a writ of mandamus, commanding the auditor to audit and allow the account.

The application for a mandamus is refused. It is no part of the duty of the auditor to determine the right to the office. It is sufficient to justify him in refusing to audit the account of Winston, that another person is in fact the officer holding the commission. The right to the office cannot be determined as a collateral matter in this proceeding. The law provides a direct proceeding for such cases.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • State ex rel. Gallagher v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1928
    ...to restore one to office so removed or to compel payment of salary by the city. St. Louis County Court v. Sparks, 10 Mo. 117; Winston v. Mosely, 35 Mo. 146; State ex rel. v. Thompson, 36 Mo. 71; State ex rel. v. Commissioners, 14 Mo. App. 297; State ex rel. v. City, 90 Mo. 19; Manker v. Fau......
  • State ex rel. Gallagher v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1928
    ...70; State ex rel. v. Rodman, 43 Mo. 256; State ex rel. v. County Court, 25 Mo.App. 446; State ex rel. Cannon v. May, 106 Mo. 488; Winston v. Moseley, 35 Mo. 146; Stabler Porter, 232 P. 187; State v. Atlantic City, 8 L. R. A. 697; Jarramilo v. County Comrs., 250 P. 729; People ex rel. v. She......
  • State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1929
    ...Mo. 117; State ex rel. v. Thompson, 36 Mo. 70; State ex rel. v. Rodman, 43 Mo. 256; State ex rel. v. Cannon v. May, 106 Mo. 488; Winston v. Mosly, 35 Mo. 146. I. Williamson, Darius A. Brown and Prescott Brown for respondents. (1) The city's Point 3 is merely an assertion that the Court of A......
  • State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 27, 1929
    ...is a judicial act and certiorari and not mandamus is the proper remedy in such case. St. Louis County v. Sparks, 10 Mo. 117; Winston v. Mosly, Auditor, 35 Mo. 146; State ex rel. v. Thompson, 36 Mo. 71; State ex rel. v. City, 90 Mo. 19; Banker v. Faulhaber, 94 Mo. 430; State ex rel. v. Slove......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT