Wirt v. Esrey
Decision Date | 29 April 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 54520,54520 |
Citation | 662 P.2d 1238,233 Kan. 300 |
Parties | Clay L. WIRT, John J. Franke, Jr., and Robert C. Bacon, as the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Johnson and as the County Board of Equalization of the County of Johnson; Donald J. Curry, as the County Clerk of said County; Edna C. Craig, as the County Treasurer of said County; and Prather H. Brown, Jr., as the County Appraiser of said County, Appellants, v. Robert C. ESREY, as Receiver, and Capitol Federal Savings and Loan Association, Appellees. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Where a court has jurisdiction of the parties to an action and of the subject matter thereof and renders a judgment within its competency, such judgment is final and conclusive, unless corrected or modified on appeal. Such a judgment is conclusive as to any other action or proceeding involving the same cause of action, subject only to the right to have the same vacated or set aside in a proper proceeding.
2. K.S.A. 60-260(b)(6) is to be liberally construed to preserve the delicate balance between the conflicting principles that litigation be brought to an end and that justice be done in light of all the facts.
3. The powers, duties, and supervisory responsibilities of the state board of tax appeals are coextensive with the state's entire scheme of taxation.
4. Under K.S.A. 79-1702, the state board of tax appeals had jurisdiction to order a refund of taxes in an equalization appeal brought pursuant to K.S.A. 79-1609 even though the claim for refund was not formally presented to the county board of equalization.
Bernis G. Terry, Asst. County Counselor, argued the cause, and Lyndus A. Henry, County Counselor, was with him on briefs for appellants.
John Anderson, Jr., of Anderson, Granger, Nagels & Lastelic, Chartered, Overland Park, argued the cause and was on brief for appellees.
This is an action arising from a dispute over the assessment of an apartment complex located in Johnson County for ad valorem tax purposes. As the opinion will demonstrate, most of the issues presented in the trial court and on appeal involve questions of jurisdiction, procedure, and the scope of appellate review of decisions of the taxing authorities rather than error in the assessment of the property.
In determining the case, the Honorable Lewis C. Smith filed a well-reasoned, comprehensive memorandum decision which sets forth at length the decisive facts, outlines the issues, and states the considerations for the court's decision and judgment. We include here those portions of the memorandum decision involving issues which have been raised on the appeal.
MEMORANDUM DECISIONStatement of Facts:
1. The real estate involved herein consists of land and improvements comprising an apartment complex located at 87th Street and Mastin in Overland Park, Kansas, and commonly known as The Clines Apartments.
2. Appellee, Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Association (Capitol Federal) was mortgagee of the Clines property and ultimately through foreclosure became owner.
3. On April 9, 1976, Robert C. Esrey, theretofore appointed by the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, in Case No. 49,941, as receiver and agent for the land and improvements described as The Clines Apartments, together with Capitol Federal, filed an equalization appeal in Docket No. 76-1 to the County Board of Equalization (County Board) of Johnson County, Kansas, from the assessment of said property for the year 1976.
4. On April 21, 1976, the equalization appeal was heard by said County Board. As a result of taxpayer's appeal, a change of assessment was made upon finding that an error had been made in computing the 5. On June 4, 1976, Capitol Federal and Robert C. Esrey, as receiver, filed an appeal to the State Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) sitting as the State Board of Equalization, alleging the valuation on the subject properties should have been reduced by an additional amount.
square footage of the improvement. As a result thereof, the County Board made and entered its decision in said equalization appeal on May 12, 1976, reducing the valuation of the land from $251,600 to $223,200, and the valuation of the improvements from $2,096,800 to $1,821,000 or a total reduction of $2,348,400 to $2,044,400 (i.e. reduction of 13%).
6. On August 11, 1976, evidence was presented before BOTA by all the parties involved herein and the Board, having concluded the hearing, took the appeal under advisement, granting the parties leave to submit suggested findings of fact and requested conclusions of law.
7. On or about January 5, 1976, Capitol Federal served by mail its amended petition and cross-petition adding a tax protest count relating to ad valorem taxes for the years 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, and the first half of 1975 in its then pending action for foreclosure involving The Clines Apartments (Case No. 49,941). Capitol Federal's amended petition asserted a claim in the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, for refund of taxes paid under protest for the first half of 1975 and for the said prior years. The amended petition and cross-petition were brought pursuant to K.S.A. 79-2005.
8. On August 17, 1976, the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, concluded that said tax protest failed and, sustaining the motion of the county, dismissed the amended petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
9. On September 14, 1976, the taxpayer, Capitol Federal, filed a memorandum in the equalization appeal pending before BOTA. The taxpayer, for the first time in the equalization proceeding, sought a refund of taxes paid under protest. The request for the refund was brought pursuant to K.S.A. 74-2439 and K.S.A. 79-1701 et seq.
10. On or about February 3, 1977, BOTA made and entered its order, copies of which were mailed to the parties on February 8, 1977, which order described the issues as follows:
11. With regard to the first issue, as articulated by BOTA, it was determined:
Accordingly, BOTA denied the taxpayer's appeal from the determination of the County Board.
12. With regard to the second issue, as articulated by BOTA, it was determined:
13. With regard to the second issue, BOTA further determined:
15. On March 8, 1977, Johnson County filed a motion for a rehearing concerning Paragraphs 14 and 15 of said order and the order of refund for the tax year 1975.
16. On March 10, 1977, Johnson County served and filed a notice of appeal from that part of the order of BOTA whereby BOTA ordered Johnson County to refund or credit 1975 real estate taxes, said appeal being docketed as Case No. 68,767 in the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas.
17. On March 17, 1977, BOTA made and entered an order granting a limited rehearing pertaining to the ability of BOTA to refund and the amount due and owing.
18. On April 6, 1977, Robert C. Esrey, as receiver, and Capitol Federal filed a notice of appeal in the District Court of Johnson County from that part of the order of BOTA dated February 3, 1977, and the order of BOTA denying rehearing on said matter dated March 17, 1977, wherein BOTA denied taxpayer's relief in the application for relief from the assessment of The Clines Apartments. This appeal was docketed as Case No. 69,248.
19. On May 24, 1977, a hearing was held, pursuant to the order for limited rehearing before BOTA. On August 3, 1977, BOTA made and entered an order wherein BOTA, affirming its determination in the prior order dated February 3, 1977, further determined:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ling v. Jan's Liquors
...Ling is afforded the safeguard of having all her allegations taken as true and all inferences drawn favorably to her. Wirt v. Esrey, 233 Kan. 300, 662 P.2d 1238 (1983). Applying that principle, we look to the complaint for the facts. It At approximately 1 a.m., on Sunday, February 3, 1980, ......
-
Columbian Fin. Corp. v. Bowman
...a court of competent jurisdiction which renders a judgment within its competency, the cause of action is barred. Wirt v. Esrey , 233 Kan. 300, 308, 662 P.2d 1238 (1983). Carson v. Davidson , 248 Kan. 543, 548–49, 808 P.2d 1377, 1382 (Kan. 1991) (quoting In re Estate of Reed , 236 Kan. 514, ......
-
IN RE APPEAL OF PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO.
...200 Kan. 447, Syl. ¶ 1. BOTA is considered the paramount, lawfully constituted taxing authority in Kansas. Wirt v. Esrey, 233 Kan. 300, 314, 662 P.2d 1238 (1983). Kansas statutory and case law mandate that, on appeal, the Department bears the burden of showing BOTA's decision was invalid. S......
-
Appeal of AT & T Technologies, Inc.
...so far as practicable, to reconcile different provisions so as to make them consistent, harmonious, and sensible. Wirt v. Esrey, 233 Kan. 300, 662 P.2d 1238 (1983). "The Board believes that the term 'using' and the term 'used' found in K.S.A. 79-3703 must be interpreted by application of th......