Wirtz v. Cincinnati, Newport and Covington Transp. Co.

Decision Date29 March 1967
Docket NumberNo. 16953.,16953.
Citation375 F.2d 513
PartiesW. Willard WIRTZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CINCINNATI, NEWPORT AND COVINGTON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Inc., and Richard C. Bennett, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Robert E. Ruberg, Covington, Ky., for appellants, O'Hara & Ruberg, Covington, Ky., on brief.

William H. Horkan, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., for appellee, Charles Donahue, Solicitor of Labor, Bessie Margolin, Associate Solicitor, Robert E. Nagle, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Jeter S. Ray, Regional Atty., Dept. of Labor, Nashville, Tenn., on brief.

Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky entered in favor of the Secretary of Labor. The Secretary, appellee herein, had filed a complaint to enforce the minimum wage and maximum hour provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1062-63 (1938), as amended; 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207 (1964).

The sole question is whether appellant transportation company is engaged in the business of operating taxi cabs within the meaning of an exemption clause in the Fair Labor Standards Act, § 13(a) (12), 29 U.S.C. § 213(a) (12) (1964). The particular part of its operation which appellant claims to be within this exemption is that involved in the operation of four-passenger sedans which it calls "Red Tops," and which it operates from the Cincinnati Airport in the vicinity of Covington, Kentucky.

The case was heard upon testimony and stipulations. The District Judge found as facts the following:

"8. The Red Tops have certain attributes of a regular taxicab in that they are of a four-passenger capacity and do not operate over fixed routes according to a predetermined time schedule. However, all trips must either originate or terminate at the airport, the Red Tops are used for the sole purpose of providing ground transportation to and from the airport and their use by the general public is restricted to those traveling to and from the said airport. The Red Tops are unmetered, do not have vacancy signs and are not advertised as taxicabs.
They stand and wait for passengers only at the airport.
"9. The drivers of the cars are not free to organize their own time and use little or no initiative in securing passengers. The number of drivers on duty at any given time is determined by the defendants in advance by use of schedules of arrivals and departures of airplanes secured from the various airlines mentioned in Findings of Fact No. 6.
"10. Defendants stipulated that employee-drivers of the Red Tops were paid wages at rates less than the rates required by section 6 of the Act (29 U.S.C. § 206). * * *"

Based on these findings, the District Judge concluded:

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Mascol v. E & L Transp., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • May 9, 2005
    ...exemption did not apply. Id. at 1058 (citing Airlines Transp. v. Tobin, 198 F.2d 249 (4th Cir.1952) and Wirtz v. Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Transp. Co., 375 F.2d 513 (6th Cir.1967)). The district court placed significant weight on the following ... the defendants' business is different......
  • Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Serv., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 19, 2018
    ...See, e.g. , Abel v. S. Shuttle Servs., Inc. , 301 F. App'x 856, 860–61 (11th Cir. 2008) ; Wirtz v. Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Transp. Co. , 375 F.2d 513, 514 (6th Cir. 1967) (per curiam); Arena v. Plandome Taxi Inc. , No. 12-CV-1078 (DRH), 2014 WL 1427907, at *9 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2014......
  • Rossi v. Associated Limousine Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • July 5, 2006
    ... ... See Wirtz v. Cincinnati, Newport and Covington ... Page 1364 ... service for the elderly and handicapped); Airlines Transp. v. Tobin, 198 F.2d 249 (4th cir.1952)(holding that ... ...
  • Powell v. Carey Intern., Inc., 0521395CIV.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • March 1, 2007
    ...under circumstances where the vehicles are more similar to "taxicabs" than in the case at bar. See Wirtz v. Cincinnati, Newport and Covington Transportation Co., 375 F.2d 513 (6th Cir. 1967) (finding that "red top" sedans which were not metered, did not have vacancy signs and which were not......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT