Wisniewski v. Wisniewski's Estate
| Decision Date | 01 June 1931 |
| Docket Number | No. 7.,7. |
| Parties | WISNIEWSKI v. WISNIEWSKI'S ESTATE. |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to Circuit Court, Wayne County; George W. Sample, Judge.
Action by Mary Wisniewski against the estate of Joseph Wisniewski. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
Argued before the Entire Bench.
Abbott & Coulter, of Detroit, for appellant.
L. Eugene Sharp, of Detroit (Gladys Catherwood, of Detroit, of counsel), for appellee.
This is a claim against an estate for care and maintenance of a daughter of the deceased from the time she was six years of age until she was sixteen, from October 1, 1913, to December 22, 1923, under an oral agreement for compensation at $5 per week, no part of which was paid. Trial was by jury with verdict and judgment thereon for plaintiff. Plaintiff is the wife of a son of the deceased and the little girl was cared for and supported in the home of plaintiff and her husband.
Defendant gave notice of the statute of limitations (Comp. Laws 1929, § 13976), and contends that in no event can plaintiff recover for support furnished more than six years before filing the claim. Under the alleged contract the pay at the rate of $5 per week was for a continuous service which was rendered and not closed until within six years before presentation of the claim. The point is without merit. Carter v. Carter, 36 Mich. 207.
Defendant also invokes the rule that household or home rendered services of the wife belong to the husband and the claim here made is for services rendered in the home, and therefore, in law, the claim is that of the husband. The evidence justified the jury in finding that the contract was made with plaintiff, not only by express consent of her husband to that effect, but, as well, in directing his father to make the contract with her. The rule that services of the wife in and about the home belong to the husband is not one beyond the power of the husband to waive. A husband may, by his consent, permit the wife to contract for special services to be rendered another in their home and to receive pay therefor. Cogent reasons existed for consent in this instance by plaintiff's husband; the little girl was his sister; her mother was dead; she needed a home and a woman's care and oversight; he was incapacitated by long-continued illness from earning enough to maintain his home and his wife was, in fact, the breadwinner.
The court instructed the jury to disallow the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Blazer Foods, Inc. v. RESTAURANT PROP., INC.
...109, citing Carter v. Carter, 36 Mich. 207 (1877), Burch v. Woodworth, 68 Mich. 519, 36 N.W. 721 (1888), and Wisniewski v. Wisniewski's Estate, 254 Mich. 663, 236 N.W. 899 (1931). However, plaintiffs in the instant case are not in the same position as the contractor in Hanover, the caregive......
-
Allen v. Allen, 43874
...as an open, running account. Linnemann v. Kirchner, 189 Iowa 336, 178 N.W. 899; Carroll v. McCoy, 40 Iowa 38; Wisniewski v. Wisniewski's Estate, 254 Mich. 663, 236 N.W. 899; Myers v. Saltry, 163 Ky. 481, 173 S.W. 1138; Jackson v. Mull, 6 Wyo. 55, 42 P. 603; Craighead v. Roberts, supra. In K......
-
Isaacs v. Deutsch
...due under such a contract, regardless of the limitation period, until the termination of the contract. In Wisniewski v. Wisniewski's Estate, 254 Mich. 663, 236 N.W. 899, a claim was made against the estate of the deceased father for the care and maintenance of his daughter for a ten-year pe......
-
Hartle v. Keefer's Estate
...v. Norton, between that case and the case of Stackable v. Stackable's Estate, 65 Mich. 515, 32 N. W. 808. In Wisniewski v. Wisniewski's Estate, 254 Mich. 663, 236 N. W. 899, the decisive question here did not arise. That case involved personal services of the wife, which by existing statute......