Witt v. Witt, 90-0502
| Decision Date | 24 October 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-0502,90-0502 |
| Citation | 568 So.2d 539 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D2649 Sue W. WITT, Appellant, v. Louis W. WITT, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
William H. Stolberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Karen Kantner of Fine Jacobson Schwartz Nash Block & England, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Sue Witt appeals from the trial court's denial of attorney's fees arising out of a post judgment proceeding in a dissolution of marriage action. Appellant argues that the court had jurisdiction under the final judgment of dissolution and was required to award the fees pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement. We agree.
Appellee sought recovery of a federal income tax refund check and filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement. The trial court concluded that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction since the subject of the refund check had not been resolved as part of the property settlement in the earlier dissolution action. Appellant filed for attorney's fees pursuant to a provision in the settlement agreement providing that such fees be awarded to the prevailing party in enforcement actions. The trial court denied appellant's motion, concluding that neither party had prevailed.
We find no merit in appellee's argument that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant attorney's fees. In the final judgment of dissolution the trial court specifically retained jurisdiction to rule on enforcement actions. Appellee brought such an enforcement action, but lost due to the fact the refund check was not subject to the retained jurisdiction of the trial court. See Steinfeld v. Steinfeld, 553 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (). It is clear appellant prevailed in the action given that appellee failed to obtain a favorable judgment.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a determination and award to appellant of reasonable attorney's fees.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dean v. Dean
...conditions to an award under that statute are therefore irrelevant. Crews v. Crews, 629 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Witt v. Witt, 568 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The amount of these fees shall be determined after Reversed and remanded with directions. 1 The clause in question provide......
-
Trowbridge v. Trowbridge, 94-3121
...and should be respected by the courts. (citations omitted). See also Dean v. Dean, 655 So.2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Witt v. Witt, 568 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The trial court concluded in its order awarding the wife fees and costs As much as the Former Husband would like to view this......
-
Rose v. Rose, 91-3575
...is without discretion to decline to enforce the provision. Jacobson v. Jacobson, 595 So.2d 292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Witt v. Witt, 568 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The husband's eleventh hour Petition for Modification of his child support and medical expense obligations does not defeat the......