Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp.

Decision Date25 January 1979
Citation67 A.D.2d 830,413 N.Y.S.2d 70
PartiesStephen and Patricia WOJCIECHOWSKI et al., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION, Heckett Company, Division of Harsco Corporation, Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Paul Shatkin, Buffalo, for appellants.

Siegel, McGee, Kelleher, Hirschorn & Munley, Buffalo, by Michael McGee, Buffalo, for respondent, Republic Steel Corp.

Brown, Maloney, Gallup, Roach & Busteed, Buffalo, by Michael McGee, Buffalo, for respondent, Heckett Co., Div. of Harsco Corp.

Before MOULE, J. P., and DILLON, HANCOCK, SCHNEPP and WITMER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

The order dismissing plaintiffs' complaint insofar as it purports to allege a class action under Article 9 of the CPLR should be affirmed. The complaint contains allegations of damage in specific amounts to residential properties owned by certain of the named plaintiffs occurring on January 28, 1977 when defendants allegedly caused precipitator dust to become airborne thereby causing discoloration and depreciation in value of the residences. Paragraph 32 of the complaint alleges: "Plaintiffs bring this cause of action against the defendants on behalf of all residential property owners situated in the South District whose real estate has been damaged, discolored and depreciated, and whose damages have not been paid by the defendants herein resulting from the negligence, carelessness and unlawfulness of the defendants occurring on or about January 28, 1977." The record establishes conclusively that the two central issues pertaining to each residential property (i. e., whether any discoloration was caused by defendants' actions on January 28, 1977 and, if so, the extent of the damages resulting therefrom) are questions which require individual investigation and proof and which must be decided separately with respect to each individual claim (see Rosenfeld v. Robins Co., 63 A.D.2d 11, 407 N.Y.S.2d 196; Kanon v. Brookdale Hosp. Med. Center, 87 Misc.2d 816, 386 N.Y.S.2d 274; and see Vincent v. Hughes Air West, Inc., 557 F.2d 759 (9th Cir. 1977); Advisory Committee's Note, Proposed Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 23 (39 F.R.D. 69, 103)).

Furthermore, it appears from plaintiffs' complaint that the class has not been and cannot be described with certainty. Concededly the location of a property within the South District of Buffalo is not determinative and membership in the class necessarily...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 15 Diciembre 1980
    ...49 N.Y.2d 799, 426 N.Y.S.2d 735, 403 N.E.2d 458; Tanzer v. Turbodyne Corp., 68 A.D.2d 614, 417 N.Y.S.2d 706; Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp., 67 A.D.2d 830, 413 N.Y.S.2d 70, mot. for lv. to app. dsmd. 47 N.Y.2d 707, 418 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 391 N.E.2d 1366; Community Serv. Soc. v. Welfare I......
  • Maddicks v. Big City Props., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 22 Octubre 2019
    ...nom. Borden v. 400 E. 55th St. Assoc., L.P. , 24 N.Y.3d 382, 998 N.Y.S.2d 729, 23 N.E.3d 997 [2014] ; Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp. , 67 A.D.2d 830, 413 N.Y.S.2d 70 [4th Dept. 1979], lv . dismissed 47 N.Y.2d 802 [1979] ). As for whether the complaint here was properly dismissed, cer......
  • Adler v. Ogden Cap Props., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 11 Diciembre 2013
    ...from the affidavits that there was as a matter of law no basis for class action relief”), quoting Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp., 67 A.D.2d 830, 831, 413 N.Y.S.2d 70 (4th Dept. 1979).11 Such defective classes include improper parties to a § 235–b claim (discussed earlier) and classes......
  • Downing v. First Lenox Terrace Assocs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Abril 2013
    ...the complaint and from the affidavits that there was as a matter of law no basis for class action relief” ( Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp., 67 A.D.2d 830, 831, 413 N.Y.S.2d 70 [4th Dept. 1979), lv. dismissed47 N.Y.2d 802 [1979] ). Here, the issue presented is whether, as a matter of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 9 SPECIAL TOPICS IN TOXIC TORTS: CLASSES, DAMAGES AND FORMS OF RELIEF
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Natural Resources & Environmental Litigation II (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...whether each plaintiff assumed a known risk, and whether each plaintiff mitigated his damages.); Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp., 67 A.D.2d 830, 413 N.Y.S.2d 70, 71 (App. Div.), app. dismissed, 47 N.Y.2d 707, 418 N.Y.S.2d 1025 (1979) (certification denied of a class alleging property ......
  • New York State class actions: make it work - fulfill the promise.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 74 No. 2, January - January 2011
    • 1 Enero 2011
    ...(2) encouraging motions to dismiss class allegations prior to pre-certification discovery, see Wojciechowski v. Republic Steel Corp., 67 A.D.2d 830, 830, 413 N.Y.S.2d 70, 71 (App. Div. 4th Dep't 1979); (3) requiring plaintiffs to demonstrate the size and nature of the class, yet limiting pr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT