Wolfcale v. Wells County

Decision Date20 July 1977
Docket NumberNo. 2-277A52,2-277A52
Citation364 N.E.2d 1023,173 Ind.App. 569
PartiesRichard D. WOLFCALE, Appellant (Petitioner below), v. WELLS COUNTY, 1 Appellee (Respondent below).
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Kent H. Musser, of McDonald & Musser, Indianapolis, for appellant.

William D. Seese, Gallivan, Hamilton, Hamilton, Seese & Patterson, Bluffton, for appellee.

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Richard D. Wolfcale was suspended and thereafter terminated as a Wells County Deputy Sheriff following proceedings before the Wells County Sheriff's Merit Board. Wolfcale sought "judicial review" of that determination in the Wells Circuit Court. Following change of venue, the Adams Circuit Court dismissed Wolfcale's Petition for Judicial Review, reasoning that the Administrative Adjudication Act, I.C. 4-22-1-14 (Burns' 1974) was applicable and that Wolfcale had failed to bring himself within the provisions of that Act for purposes of review in that the petition was not verified and was not filed within fifteen days after notice of the Merit Board decision. We reverse.

Our disposition is governed by Tippecanoe Valley School Corporation v. Leachman (1970) 147 Ind.App. 443, 261 N.E.2d 880 (transfer denied), a case cited neither by Wolfcale nor by the County. The court there held the Administrative Adjudication Act "applicable only to agencies of statewide government . . ." (original emphasis). It is therefore apparent that the reviewing court below erred in applying the fifteen day filing requirement of the Act to Wolfcale's petition for review.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

WHITE, J., concurs.

LOWDERMILK, J., (participating by designation) concurs.

1 The Petition for Judicial Review was not sought against the County in the usual style, i. e., Board of Commissioners of the County of Wells (See I.C. 17-1-14-5 (Burns' 1974)) nor against the county governmental organization whose decision is attacked, i. e., Wells County Sheriff's Merit Board. See Indiana Rules of Procedure T.R. 19(F); T.R. 83; State ex rel. Jose v. City of Indianapolis (1935) 209 Ind. 156, 198 N.E. 297; Hatcher v. Bd. of Comm'rs. of Lake Co. (3d Dist. 1972) 155 Ind.App. 27, 290 N.E.2d 801. Neither was service of process made except by service upon the county attorney. See T.R. 4.6(A) (4). The County has nevertheless submitted to the jurisdiction of the reviewing court below and to the jurisdiction of this court upon appeal.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Bolerjack v. Forsythe
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 10, 1984
    ...five-day notice of matters to be determined by administrative agency not applicable to sheriff's merit board); Wolfcale v. Wells County (1977), 173 Ind.App. 569, 364 N.E.2d 1023 (deputy sheriff suspended by merit board not limited by AAA's fifteen day period in which to seek judicial review......
  • Tippecanoe County Area Plan Commission v. Sheffield Developers, Inc.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • August 20, 1979
    ...the AAA does not apply. See Yunker v. Porter County Sheriff's Merit Board, (1978) Ind.App., 382 N.E.2d 977; Wolfcale v. Wells County, (1977) Ind.App., 364 N.E.2d 1023; Tippecanoe Valley School Corp. v. Leachman, (1970) 147 Ind.App. 443, 261 N.E.2d 880.9 4.33 The plat shall contain the follo......
  • Evansville Book Mart, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis, IP 79-20-C
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Indiana
    • September 21, 1979
    ...do not automatically apply to municipal agency hearings as they would to hearings before most state agencies. See Wolfcale v. Wells County, Ind.App., 364 N.E.2d 1023 (1977). The case law does not state that a municipality is not permitted to adopt the procedures of the Administrative Adjudi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT